User talk:Rousearts

Proposed deletion notice
I have placed a proposed deletion tag on Organization Development Institute and Organization Development Institute's as I do not believe that these articles satisfy Wikipedia's sourcing and notability guidelines, and as they are effectively duplicates. If you disagree with the deletion of one or both of these articles, you may remove the proposed deletion tag and the article will not be deleted by the proposed deletion process. However, the article may still be placed on articles for deletion to reach consensus on whether or not the article should be deleted. It is courteous, but not required, to explain why you disagree with deletion if you choose to remove the tags. If the proposed deletion tag remains for five days, the article will be deleted. Seraphimblade 22:43, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --19:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

License tagging for File:OD Talent - Rouse Circles.gif
Thanks for uploading File:OD Talent - Rouse Circles.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:07, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ergosophy


The article Ergosophy has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable term, verging on neologism. Filtering for wikis and blogs gives on 17 ghits. Unreferenced. Fails WP:VER, WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 08:46, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Business Intelegant


The article Business Intelegant has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references, no evidence of notability. Fails WP:N and WP:VER

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 08:48, 17 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Are you by any chance associated with this company? Could I then suggest WP:COI for reading, please. Tomas e (talk) 17:37, 18 October 2009 (UTC)