User talk:Rouxxx

Fanlistings
I see you've added fanlistings to a number of article (Ottawa Senators et al). However, there's nothing in the edit summary or link to explain why these fanlistings are exceptional—since, per WP:EL, "fanlistings are generally not informative and should not ordinarily be included." Can you justify why they should be included? Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 15:19, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Fanlistings
My apologies, I did not know the policy on fanlisitngs. I understand that some fanlistings do not have any useful information, however this is not always the case. The 'Wade Redden' site has a gallery, information, articles and stats etc., as does the ‘Ottawa Senators’ site which is quite comprehensive. The other fansites have basic information and are works always in progress. If nothing else, I would appreciate it if you would leave the links to the Wade Redden (Reds Zone) and Ottawa Senators (Sens and Sens-ablity) intact, as they are much more than mere fanlistings. Thanks. —Roux 11:33 a.m. (est), 19 April 2006


 * Regardless there is no need for any of the links for http://www.bohemianwhisper.com/sens/index.html which keeps getting up up there. Please stop putting them up.--Maraulth 23:57, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Fanlistings
There is a great deal of info on the 'Reds Zone' and 'Sens and Sens-ablity' listings ... forgive me, but I thought information is what an encyclopedia was for?! Excuse me for trying to give people a little more information. Maybe you should look at the sites and see for yourselves... how much more info about the team do you need? What colour underwear they wear!? Please reconsider allowing the two links to stand unmolested, based on their content.Thank you. http://www.bohemianwhisper.com/sens/index.html http://www.bohemianwhisper.com/wade/index.html Roux 2:34 p.m. (est), 21 April 2006


 * WP:EL. SEE: #2,3,9. ccwaters 22:30, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Fanlistings
I give up! So much for freedom of speech and freedom of access to relevent information. *shrugs* Self appointed censors... ridiculous!
 * Speech is free...on your own website. Whether something is worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia is an issue of vetting the content for quality and usefulness and has nothing to do with censorship. —C.Fred (talk) 21:34, 12 May 2006 (UTC)