User talk:Roxana Cioban

Your submission at Articles for creation: Berg Software (May 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:Berg Software may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Roxana_Cioban Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Roxana_Cioban reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:05, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Disclosure of employment
Hello Roxana Cioban. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:Berg Software, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Roxana Cioban. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:48, 3 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Hello, I did not receive money for this edit and nobody put me up to this, it's just information about a firm. I get why it got declined and I'm sorry for the inconveniences. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roxana Cioban (talk • contribs)


 * There is off-wiki evidence that shows you have an association with the company. You are not prohibited from writing about them, but you must comply with Wikipedia's paid editing disclosure rules to do so. You are welcome to edit other topics where you do not have any personal or professional connections. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:51, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your message. I understand and I will not make this mistake again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2F09:3160:4F2:610F:CD46:AC7A:B9E0 (talk) 21:06, 4 May 2018 (UTC)