User talk:Royalhose

Welcome
Hello, Royalhose, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! liquidluck ✽ talk 01:34, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Jack London. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Please know that Wikipedia's policy on information is verifiability, rather than "the truth". In other words, something may be true but if it is not reported in a reliable source&mdash;such as a book or an article from a notable journal&mdash;it is not appropriate for a Wikipedia page. Thank you. liquidluck ✽ talk 02:15, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jack London. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Edison (talk) 02:29, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Pop culture addict for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. liquidluck ✽ talk 07:08, 21 April 2010 (UTC)