User talk:Royalmate1


 * The only errors that have been done are against me. The Wikipedia community is a joke and there needs to be purge of Wikipedia administrators and the Arbitration Committee needs to be disbanded. Only then can real reform be hoped for the site. Until then, I apologize for nothing, and I await the immediate repeal of my indefinite block.  Royal Mate1  02:40, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

respecting image copyrights
Hi, many images on your userpages (especially but not only on your navigational headers) are copyrighted, but you don't fulfil their licenses' attribution requirements. Please either remove link= from the syntax embedding them or create an "image credits" subpage for each userpage using a copyrighted image this way.    FDMS   4    22:28, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 March 2015

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:29, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Royalmate1! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 05:36, Tuesday, March 17, 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 March 2015
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:34, 21 March 2015 (UTC).

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Royalmate1/Singularity


A tag has been placed on User:Royalmate1/Singularity, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of Wikipedia content, copied without attribution. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
 * It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:45, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Royalmate1/Royalmate7


A tag has been placed on User:Royalmate1/Royalmate7, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of Wikipedia content, copied without attribution. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
 * It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Royalmate1/Royalmate6


A tag has been placed on User:Royalmate1/Royalmate6, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of Wikipedia content, copied without attribution. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
 * It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:33, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for blatant insults and personal attacks; serious ownership issues. Wikipedia is not your personal webhost. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:40, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

So now it's a week? You have no business telling people who can and cannot edit this site.  Royal Mate1  21:42, 25 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I extended 's 72 hour block after I saw this. Any unblock requests must include an assurance that you will not a) use Wikipedia as a webhost; b) You will not knowingly expose the project to legal action through copyright violations, and c) You will cease insulting and attacking people who are acting on the previous two issues, which are clearly delineated by Wikipedia policy and we all must follow whether we like them or not. § FreeRangeFrog croak 21:46, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Block
I have blocked you for this edit.

Regarding "I may use wikipedua userpages in a manner I wish to" in an edit summary, this is most emphatically not true. We have a clear speedy deletion criterion: U5 - using Wikipedia as a free host. Your pages are just one massive violation of this rule. Ridiculously large pages consisting mainly of copy and pastes of Wikipedia articles having no relationship to the small number of mainspace edits that you are doing. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:45, 25 March 2015 (UTC)


 * You're a fool and I hope you leave Wikipedia immediately. You're the cancer that is killing this site. Stop deleting my userpages or I will ask for you to be blocked from editing due to vandalism. Simply remove the copyrighted material. There is no precedent for not posting parts of articles in a userspace, and if there is, I do not recognize it.  Royal Mate1  21:55, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Royalmate1/Scott Cox


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that User:Royalmate1/Scott Cox, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
 * It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Phantom Tech (talk) 22:07, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Unblock request
 Royal Mate1  22:19, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Phantom Tech (talk) 22:39, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

=Unblock me already=

Now this is just a joke. You're clearly an idiot. I posted the reference which gave due credit to the Newsweek article. I question your capacity as an Administrator here and I demand that you rescind your "judgment" and my indefinite block which is a clear violation of WP policies. It's not a personal attack if it's true.  Royal Mate1  02:27, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

@Dianaaa - Since you clearly know nothing of copyright law or anything thereof, maybe you should have a look at this article: Copyright law of the United States.  Royal Mate1  02:31, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

So far, one administrator has blocked you, two have extended that block and two more have denied appeals. That's 5 different administrators who all agree that you should be blocked. If you genuinely believe that your block was not in line with policy I recommend describing why instead of just repeatedly accusing them of violating policy. Phantom Tech (talk) 02:59, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikia
I presume you are user: Zeus MC who has had a brief existence on Wikia. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:19, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Sorry for the delay. I had real life issues so I hope you'll not mind this delay. -- Pr at yya   (Hello!) 14:53, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings
To You and Yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:22, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jeanine E. Jackson


The article Jeanine E. Jackson has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Most sources are just fleeting mentions, although there is this from White House and this from AllGov. They mostly seem to be US government-related websites which aren't independent.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Jolly  Ω   Janner  20:02, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Jeanine E. Jackson for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeanine E. Jackson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jeanine E. Jackson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Jolly  Ω   Janner  04:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 01:48, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Craig B. Lloyd


The article Craig B. Lloyd has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:SOLDIER, nothing notable since leaving the Coast Guard

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Craig B. Lloyd for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Craig B. Lloyd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Craig B. Lloyd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Contests
User:Dr. Blofeld has created WikiProject Africa/Contests. The idea is to run a series of contests/editathons focusing on each region of Africa. He has spoken to Wikimedia about it and $1000-1500 is possible for prize money. As someone who has previously expressed interest in African topics, would you be interested in contributing to one or assisting draw up core article/missing article lists? He says he's thinking of North Africa for an inaugural one in October. If interested please sign up in the participants section of the Contest page, thanks.♦ -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Edward P. Brynn


The article Edward P. Brynn has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of notability, not a single secondary source. Nothing found on Google News, nothing useful on Google Books."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 18:48, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Edward P. Brynn for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edward P. Brynn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Edward P. Brynn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 20:34, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Jerry Demings for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jerry Demings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jerry Demings& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 08:54, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Proposed deletion of Edim Demir


The article Edim Demir has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails notability, only played in the Turkish second-tier league and below."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.