User talk:Roychakorborty

February 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Ventom International Motion Corp has been reverted. Your edit here to Ventom International Motion Corp was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.fb.com/ventomindia/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:28, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Snabbkaffe (talk) 10:39, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ventom International Motion Corp, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. ''

'''Please do not remove the speedy deletion template. Thank you.' bonadea contributions talk 21:06, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Ventom International Motion Corp. bonadea contributions talk 21:18, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

You must not remove the tag from the article. Please do not do that again. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 22:04, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Ventom International Motion Corp. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. SS13 (talk • contribs) 04:23, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself. SS13 (talk • contribs) 04:25, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Ventom International Motion Corp has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. SS13 (talk • contribs) 04:45, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Ventom International Motion Corp shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SS13 (talk • contribs) 04:46, 2 March 2015 (UTC)