User talk:RoygbivX3Y1

I edit the page because the original post mainly referenced the fetish category Giantess of Macrofilia and not the actual sexual orientation of Macrofialiacs. The original post also specified men as being the dominant interest in marcophilia. When in truth this is false. The original post also doesn't go into detail on the sexuality or the orientation of macrophilia. When it is more then a giantess fetish of men being eaten by giant woman.

Welcome!
Hello, RoygbivX3Y1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 17:25, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Hello, I'm Mr.Sarcastic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Macrophilia‎ have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 17:26, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

( The web links and references on the bottom are not active when you click on them.the where from the original post in 2019)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Macrophilia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 18:12, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

i have provided sources its not vandalism the information to the original page of macrophilia is not valid. it is missing links a contains bias information

"according to Mark Griffiths's speculation.[11]" Monk, Felicity (2016-10-26). "The Men Who Want to Have Sex with Actual Giants". Vice. Retrieved 12 November 2016.

Quote "some macrophiles have a preference for people only a few feet taller than themselves, whereas others involve giants who are hundreds of feet high."

this is Written from the original post from there web link reference

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/mbqavv/macrophilia-fetish-the-men-who-want-to-have-sex-with-actual-giants

Some of the references/ web links on the bottom are no longer active and need to be removed or relinked

other links

By James Barrett DailyWire.com New Sexual Identity Discovered: Introducing ‘Macrosexual’ https://www.dailywire.com/news/new-sexual-identity-discovered-introducing-james-barrett

"Though the vast majority of macrosexuality is confined to the fantasy realm, Griffiths notes that some real-world “giant” sex does take place via “extraordinarily tall women,” popularly referred to as “Amazons”: “For instance, it was reported that Mikayla Miles (who when wearing her fetish boots nearly 7 feet in her fetish boots, and 6 feet 4 inches without the boots)"

Mark D. Griffiths Ph.D. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/in-excess/201504/big-love

"The literal translation of macrophilia means a "lover of large" but in this context it does not refer to those in the fat admiration community (i.e., people who are sexually attracted to very fat women) but specifically refers to individuals who are sexually attracted to people much taller than themselves "

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Macrophilia, you may be blocked from editing. ''Your additions have been reverted several times now. Please stop.'' Isaidnoway  (talk)  20:43, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:RoygbivX3Y1/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:RoygbivX3Y1/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:RoygbivX3Y1/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:RoygbivX3Y1/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:25, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Procedures
There are a couple of problems with the proposed edits at Macrophilia. There are lots of policies and guidelines to read but I won't bother linking to all of them because it's overwhelming at first. For a summary with the key information, see WP:5P.

A dictionary is not a reliable source for a topic like this. In particular, an editor must not analyze a word and offer dictionary definitions of "macro" and "philia" to imply anything about the topic. Instead, a secondary reliable source is required.

Text such as "Whereas 13.5% wanted to only date women shorter than them." is not relevant for this topic—not unless a secondary reliable source says that it is relevant. A man dating a shorter (or taller) woman is nothing to do with macrophilia. Johnuniq (talk) 02:59, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:RoygbivX3Y1/sandbox


Hello, RoygbivX3Y1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 17:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)