User talk:Roymullins

December 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --some jerk on the Internet   (talk)  20:50, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Explain "reach consensus"... my concern is not about censorship it is about a minor issue that has been posted for sensationalism rather than history. The fact that young people want to use Wikipedia is a good thIng. To have something that is irrelevant and posted there like that simply to create an unneeded stir is unfortunate. Again, if an issue like this was repeated rather than an isolated event I would understand completely. Not sure what constitutes "consensus." The comments that are posted seem to agree with me when posted by seemingly reasonable people and the other side appears to be posted by those with some sort of immature axe to grind...

July 2017
Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Enumclaw, Washington. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 00:14, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to Enumclaw, Washington, will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 07:10, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Explain "reach consensus"... my concern is not about censorship it is about a minor issue that has been posted for sensationalism rather than history. The fact that young people want to use Wikipedia is a good thIng. To have something that is irrelevant and posted there like that simply to create an unneeded stir is unfortunate. Again, if an issue like this was repeated rather than an isolated event I would understand completely. Not sure what constitutes "consensus." The comments that are posted seem to agree with me when posted by seemingly reasonable people and the other side appears to be posted by those with some sort of immature axe to grind... Roymullins (talk) 22:00, 14 July 2017 (UTC)