User talk:Royroydeb/Archive 13

Your GA nomination of Fall of Mosul
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fall of Mosul you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 19:41, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of First Battle of Tikrit
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article First Battle of Tikrit you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 04:01, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of First Battle of Tikrit
The article First Battle of Tikrit you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:First Battle of Tikrit for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 15:41, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Your review of Bhimsen Thapa article
Hi Roy, I just wanted to let you know that I have finished addressing your issues with the Bhimsen Thapa article. If you have any more suggestion, please let me know. Manoguru (talk) 19:34, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 23 July
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:15, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * On the First Battle of Tikrit page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=672701966 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F672701966%7CFirst Battle of Tikrit%5D%5D Ask for help])

Your GA nomination of First Battle of Tikrit
The article First Battle of Tikrit you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:First Battle of Tikrit for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 13:21, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fall of Mosul
The article Fall of Mosul you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Fall of Mosul for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 12:21, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Tunisian Arabic
Dear User,

Tunisian Arabic has been nominated for Wikipedia GA Status. However, no one has reviewed it. So, please review it soon.

Yours Sincerely,

--Csisc (talk) 16:34, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for First Battle of Tikrit
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:12, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

2015 GA Cup - Round 2
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:52, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Cristian Bustos
Hello! Your submission of Cristian Bustos at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Struway2 (talk) 15:45, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Serdar Tasci
Hi, I see you added the GA banner to Serdar Tasci's talk page. However, I have removed it as the article doesn't appear to have gone through a GA review. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:31, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Harry Kane
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Harry Kane you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 07:20, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tom Thorpe
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tom Thorpe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tom Thorpe
The article Tom Thorpe you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tom Thorpe for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 21:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tomb of Safdarjung
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tomb of Safdarjung you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 23:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Harry Kane
The article Harry Kane you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Harry Kane for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 18:41, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tom Thorpe
The article Tom Thorpe you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Tom Thorpe for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:01, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tomb of Safdarjung
The article Tomb of Safdarjung you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tomb of Safdarjung for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 11:21, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 26 August
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Ginho page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=677913291 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F677913291%7CGinho%5D%5D Ask for help])

Disambiguation link notification for August 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Florent Malouda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roberto Carlos. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Harry Kane
The article Harry Kane you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Harry Kane for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:21, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Harry Kane
I will be able to make edits to improve the article based on reviewers' suggestions, but because I am a frequent contributor to the article myself I cannot review it myself.

P.S., have you put the article up for DYK? If you do, I don't mind whether or not I am credited in it, you nominated it in the first place.

Salutes from England and enjoy the next season of the Super League &#39;&#39;&#39;tAD&#39;&#39;&#39; (talk) 18:53, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 September newsletter
The finals for the 2015 Wikicup has now begun! Congrats to the 8 contestants who have survived to the finals, and well done and thanks to everyone who took part in rounds 3 and 4.

In round 3, we had a three-way tie for qualification among the wildcard contestants, so we had 34 competitors. The leader was by far in Group B, who earned 1496 points. Although 913 of these points were bonus points, he submitted 15 articles in the DYK category. Second place overall was at 864 points, who although submitted just 2 FAs for 400 points, earned double that amount for those articles in bonus points. Everyone who moved forward to Round 4 earned at least 100 points.

The scores required to move onto the semifinals were impressive; the lowest scorer to move onto the finals was 407, making this year's Wikicup as competitive as it's always been. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:


 * , who is competing in his sixth consecutive Wikicup final, again finished the round in first place, with an impressive 1666 points in Pool B. Casliber writes about the natural sciences, including ornithology, botany and astronomy.  A large bulk of his points this round were bonus points.
 * , second place both in Pool B and overall, earned the bulk of his points with FPs, mostly depicting currency.
 * , first in Pool A, came in third. His specialty is natural science articles; in Round 4, he mostly submitted articles about insects and botany.  Five out of the six of the GAs he submitted were level-4 vital articles.
 * , second in Pool A, took fourth overall. He tends to focus on articles about cricket and military history, specifically the 1640s First English Civil War.
 * , from Pool A, was our highest-scoring wildcard. West Virginia tends to focus on articles about the history of (what for it!) the U.S. state of West Virginia.
 * , from Pool A, likes to work on articles about British geography and places. Most of his points this round were earned from two impressive accomplishments: a GT about Scheduled monuments in Somerset and a FT about English Heritage properties in Somerset.
 * , from Pool B, came in seventh overall. RO earned the majority of her points from GARs and PRs, many of which were earned in the final hours of the round.
 * , also from Pool B, who was competing with RO for the final two spots in the final hours, takes the race for most GARs and PRs—48.

The intense competition between RO and Calvin999 will continue into the finals. They're both eligible for the Newcomers Trophy, given for the first time in the Wikicup; whoever makes the most points will win it.

Good luck to the finalists; the judges are sure that the competition will be fierce!

, and  11:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pedro Araújo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barcelos. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles's 2015 GA Cup - Round 3
Delivered on behalf of WikiProject Good articles by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:26, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Aleppo (2012–present)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Aleppo (2012–present) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catlemur -- Catlemur (talk) 09:40, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Aleppo (2012–present), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mortar and Hague Convention. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Cristian Bustos
Gatoclass (talk) 17:49, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ranjitsinhji
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ranjitsinhji you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Relentlessly -- Relentlessly (talk) 20:00, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Serdar Tasci
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Serdar Tasci you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:20, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ranjitsinhji
The article Ranjitsinhji you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ranjitsinhji for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Relentlessly -- Relentlessly (talk) 10:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I left some outstanding concerns on this review a couple of days ago – do have a look at them. Relentlessly (talk) 20:10, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Serdar Tasci
The article Serdar Tasci you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Serdar Tasci for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 17:00, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Corona
Instead of being disrespectful with other people's work (that's why you are banned from created pages), check WT:FOOTY. Also, you're the one who should read WP:OSE. Cheers, MYS  77  ✉ 16:34, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah, either one is fine. So stop with pointless reverts, and respect other people's work. Thank you, MYS  77  ✉ 16:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)