User talk:Rp0211/Archive 2

File:GonzagaBulldogs.png and 2010–11 Gonzaga Bulldogs men's basketball team
The use of the logo on that page does not comply with WP:NFCC #10c. Please follow WP:FURG before attempting to re-add the logo to that article. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 03:43, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Screen shot 2010-05-08 at 6.44.56 PM.png
Thanks for uploading File:Screen shot 2010-05-08 at 6.44.56 PM.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:18, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Guy McGough listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Guy McGough. Since you had some involvement with the Guy McGough redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Fighting Temptation/GA1
In this GA review, you brought up the need for singlechart and referencing a music video plot. Neither of these is necessary - singlechart is one way of formatting a chart table, and music video synopsi need not be referenced per WP:PLOTSUM. Naturally, big claims in a music video section will need referencing. Adabow (talk · contribs) 22:39, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

RE
Hi there! Unfortunately I don't ave administrative power over things like this, so your best bet would be to report the user and his actions to an administrator. User:Kww is a great help to me, so I would approach him if I were you. Let me know if I can help you with anything else!-- CallMe Nathan  •  Talk2Me   00:26, 29 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I think "Hero" is done. Please check back to the review page. Thanks :)-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   19:39, 30 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much! :)-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   23:36, 11 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi again! I appreciate all the time you put into reviewing articles! Some unfortunately sit there for a very long time. Thanks a lot. believe all the fixes have been made to "Dreamlover". Thanks again! :)-- CallMe Nathan   &bull;  Talk2Me   08:40, 14 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Reminding you again :) I finished the fixes on "Dreamlover"-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   23:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Calvin  • 9 9 9 11:37, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Re: Beautiful People GA Nomination
I have fixed the issues you have pointed out and added a sample. Thanks, Ozurbanmusic (talk) 00:44, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks its my first GA! haha Ozurbanmusic (talk) 01:38, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Reduced non-free content
When you reduce non-free content, such as at File:ChrisBrown BeautifulPeople.ogg, please remember to add to the page so that an admin can delete the old versions after a week. Thanks! Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:49, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, alright. I wasn't aware of this rule. Thanks for the info! - Rp0211  ( talk2me ) 05:26, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Hey
Thanks for passing LTWYLPII, what is the GA code you put at the top of the talk page soa GA bot can make all the changes? I don't know how to do it, I've always had to do everything manually lol. Calvin  • 9 9 9 12:03, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I looked at the article at it looks like a bot has already put the GA code on the talk page. - Rp0211  ( talk2me ) 18:15, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * No I don't mean for that article, I mean in general. Because when I pass nominations, the code on the GAN page doesn't work for me, do you have to ill some of the code in? Calvin  &bull; 9 9 9  20:38, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, ok. When I pass articles for good article status, I use the template  seen on WP:GAN and put it on the talk page of the good article. For the "topic=" parameter, you include the main category the good article is listed in. For music, you would put in "Arts". For the "page=" parameter, you put the review number in (whether it is the first, second, and so on). Then, I would list the article under the appropriate section. For music, you would go to: WP:Good articles/Arts. After this, GimmeBot or GA bot should make the necessary changes. I hope this helps. If you have any more questions, please feel free to ask. - Rp0211  ( talk2me ) 21:52, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I just tried doing it in a preview before i saved, but it just shows the code. So it should look like this: ' ? Calvin ' &bull; 9 9 9  11:01, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The template should look like that. The "page=" parameter indicates the number of the GA review. For example: GA1 you would put 1, GA2 you would put 2, and so on. If you do not have the right page number, the template will probably not work right. - Rp0211  ( talk2me ) 18:13, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * So how come when i preview it before i save, it's just the code that it shown, no the GA rectangular banner? Calvin  &bull; 9 9 9  19:59, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I am not sure why it does that. It has never happened to me before. - Rp0211  ( talk2me ) 00:04, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
05:41, 15 July 2011 (UTC) Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:41, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Re:WikiCup question
Hey there. The next WikiCup will begin 1 January, though we will begin planning for it shortly. Sign ups are not yet open, but I will probably be opening them at some point in the not too distant future. I see you've already signed up to receive the newsletter; I will send out information about next years competition as and when via the newsletter. J Milburn (talk) 10:06, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi
Hey, If you are interested in creating a WikiProject:Rihanna, I would be greatfull if you give your vote here. Thanks Tomica1111  (talk)  15:34, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Here We Go Again (Ray Charles song)/GA1
What is going on with Talk:Here We Go Again (Ray Charles song)/GA1?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:14, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * FYI, this song is now listed at WP:FAC.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:05, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Hey
I was wondering if I could ask you a favour, which you don't have to do if you don't want to. I have three Rihanna articles listed as GAN at the moment, and was wondering if you would review Rihanna's 'Raining Men'? It's only a short article (shorter than Love The Way You Lie Part 2, a GAN of mine which you passed). I'm asking you because you gave a thorough review of the short article last time, and am hoping that you could do the same with 'Raining Men'? Calvin  • 9 9 9 00:43, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Lol thank you!! It will probs only take like 10 minutes haha, it's so short. Calvin  &bull; 9 9 9 01:17, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I've done/addressed all of your points. Calvin  &bull; Na Na Na C'mon!  18:11, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * That's okay.

WikiCup 2011 July newsletter
We are half way through the penultimate round of this year's WikiCup; there is less than a month to go before we have our final 8. Our pool leaders are (Pool A, 189 points) and  (Pool B, 165 points). The number of points required to reach the next round is not clear at this time; there are some users who still do not have any recorded points. Please remember to update your submissions' pages promptly. In addition, congratulations to PresN, who scored the first featured topic points in the competition for his work on Thatgamecompany related articles. Most points this round generally have, so far, come from good articles, with only one featured article (White-bellied Sea Eagle, from ) and two featured lists (Hugo Award for Best Graphic Story, from PresN and Grammy Award for Best Native American Music Album, from ). Points for Did You Know and good article reviews round out the scoring. No points have been awarded for In the News, good topics or featured pictures this round, and no points for featured sounds or portals have been awarded in the entire competition. On an unrelated note, preparation will be beginning soon for next year's WikiCup- watch this space!

There is little else to be said beyond the usual. Please list anything you need reviewing on WikiCup/Reviews, so others following the WikiCup can help, and please do help if you can by providing reviews for the articles listed there. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews generally at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup- points are, of course, offered for reviews at GAC. Two final notes: Firstly, please remember to state your participation in the WikiCup when nominating articles at FAC. Finally, some WikiCup-related statistics can be seen here and here. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 11:41, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Calvin  • Na Na Na C'mon! 19:35, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Love on Top for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Love on Top is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed here until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jivesh   •  Talk2Me  09:36, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Man Down
Thanks for starting a review for Man Down. I will start on your one tomorrow. I have a lot to do on here over the next few days! Calvin  • Na Na Na C'mon! 18:04, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I have addressed your points for Man Down. Calvin  &bull; Na Na Na C'mon!  14:47, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I've done everything now. Calvin  &bull; Na Na Na C'mon!  17:30, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh you need to add the GAN to the article milestones. Calvin  &bull; Na Na Na C'mon!  18:28, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Calvin  • Na Na Na C'mon! 01:45, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Lifehouse - Broken GAN
Is done. Calvin  • Na Na Na C'mon! 12:30, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Passed :) Calvin  &bull; Na Na Na C'mon!  17:05, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Done CKB. Calvin  • Na Na Na C'mon! 19:27, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Hanging by a Moment has been passed. Calvin  • Na Na Na C'mon! 22:47, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Yeah 3x
Thanks for reviewing. I've fixed those issues you pointed out. Oz  talk  00:17, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

David Lucas (composer)
Thank you for taking the time to do a detailed review of the David Lucas article. I will definitely work to address your concerns. I was a bit surprised, however, to see that you did an immediate fail of the nomination, rather than allowing me even a day (or week) to try and address the issues. Would you please re-consider this decision? I am confident that the issues that you brought up can be dealt with in a fairly rapid manner. For example, several items that you listed as "no source", of course do have a source, but perhaps not a citation just at that particular sentence. If I cannot fix the citations in a timely manner, you are of course welcome to fail the article, but I'd like at least an opportunity to make the fixes now, rather than have to go through a lengthy re-nomination process? --Elonka 01:57, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * (followup) I believe I have addressed the majority of your concerns, though I did have a couple questions, which I have noted on the nomination page. I very much look forward to your reply, and thank you again for your time and effort on this. --Elonka 02:48, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much for your courtesy, and your detailed review. I have another article in the queue, Linda November, and would not hesitate to work with you again if it comes up.  Best wishes, --Elonka 19:30, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Favor please
Hi there :) So we had some drama at GAN, and now Calvin is unable to review "I'll Be Lovin' U Long Time". Its sitting there in limbo now. Can you review it? Since you did "Touch My Body". It isn't that long. Anyway, thank you for for your time! In case you agree, its Talk:I'll Be Lovin' U Long Time/GA1 here.-- CallMe Nathan  •  Talk2Me   22:58, 12 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Okay, perfect! Thank you very much :)-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   23:03, 12 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Okay, I did almost everything and commented on the few I had questioned. Thanks!-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   21:43, 13 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Done :)-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   23:23, 13 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much! Same to you :)-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   01:06, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Questionable GA review practices
You are invited to join the discussion at User_talk:Two_Hearted_River/Sandbox3.  Two Hearted River  ( paddle /  fish ) 03:57, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Hey
You have probably seen that I have been advised not to continue reviewing GANs because I reviewed "too many" Mariah articles, so I regret to say that because I haven't actually started reviewing You and Me yet, that it is probably best that I don't review it to avoid any further conflict of interest, meaning that you will have to find someone else to review it for you. I'm really sorry and hope you understand :/. Calvin  • Na Na Na C'mon! 12:35, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Todo a su Tiempo (Marc Anthony album) GA review
I've managed fix most of the issues you've mentioned, but there are some I have questions, I left them in the GA review page. I hadn't been able to start fixing the issues until a day or so ago due since real-life kept me busy recently, but I'm free now. Erick (talk) 01:27, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/My Only Wish (This Year) (2nd nomination)
Hey, would please participate in this discussion? Thank for your time. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 03:37, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Deletion of topic - Hanging by a moment
I would like to know why was my contribution of lyrics to the page Hanging by a moment was deleted. Please kindly help with more tips on editing the articles and how can I improve my skills. :)

Regards,

Amin ud din shroff 07:02, 15 August 2011 (UTC)Shroffameen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shroffameen (talk • contribs)

Copy-paste move
I see that you recently moved Jason Micheal Wade to Jason Wade by copying and pasting the content. Unfortunately this is not an acceptable way of moving or renaming articles, as it loses the edit history, which must be preserved for various reasons, including copyright attribution. Normally you should move pages by using the "Move" link at the top of the page. Sometimes this is not possible, most commonly because there is already a page with the title you wish to move it to. In this case you should put at the top of the existing article with the title you want to use. This will request an administrator to delete the unwanted page and move the other one into its place. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:20, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Lifehouse
Hello Rp0211! I see that you edit Lifehouse articles. I found this interview with them. Would this be useful? Novice7 (talk) 13:50, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Good article reassessment/Wait Your Turn/1
Hi, would you please participate in this discussion? Thanks. Calvin  • Na Na Na C'mon! 15:04, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi
Please participate in this GAR. I have copy-edited the article and need to know if it is now of GA standard. Thanks. Calvin  • Na Na Na C'mon! 14:29, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

GA
"Whatever It Takes" review instructions are up. Let me know if you have any questions, Ta --FeuDeJoie (talk) 18:57, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 July newsletter
The finals are upon us; we're down to the last few. One of the eight remaining contestants will be this year's WikiCup champion! 150 was the score needed to progress to the final; just under double the 76 required to reach round 4, and more than triple the 41 required to reach round 3. Our eight finalists are:


 * , Pool A's winner. Casliber has the highest total score in the competition, with 1528, the bulk of which is made up of 8 featured articles. He has the highest number of total featured articles (8, 1 of which was eligible for double points) and total did you knows (72) of any finalist. Casliber writes mostly on biology, including ornithology, botany and mycology.
 * , Pool B's winner and the highest scorer this round. PresN is the only finalist who has scored featured topic points, and he has gathered an impressive 330, but most of his points come from his 4 featured articles, one of which scored double. PresN writes mostly on video games and the Hugo Awards.
 * , Pool A's runner-up. Hurricanehink's points are mostly from his 30 good articles, more than any other finalist, and he is also the only finalist to score good topic points. Hurricanehink, as his name suggests, writes mostly on meteorology.
 * , Pool B's runner-up. Wizardman has completed 86 good article reviews, more than any other finalist, but most of his points come from his 2 featured articles. Wizardman writes mostly on American sport, especially baseball.
 * , the "fastest loser" (Pool A). Miyagawa has written 3 featured lists, one of which was awarded double points, more than any other finalist, but he was awarded points mostly for his 68 did you knows. Miyagawa writes on a variety of topics, including dogs, military history and sport.
 * , the second "fastest loser" (Pool B). Most of Resolute's points come from his 9 good articles. He writes mostly on Canadian topics, including ice hockey.
 * , who was joint third "fastest loser" (Pool A). Most of Evan's points come from his 10 good articles, and he writes mostly on meteorology.
 * , who was joint third "fastest loser" (Pool B). Most of Phil's points come from his 9 good articles, 4 of which (more than any other finalist) were eligible for double points. He writes mostly on aeronautics.

We say goodbye to our seven other semi-finalists,, , , , , and. Everyone still in the competition at this stage has done fantastically well, and contributed greatly to Wikipedia. We're on the home straight now, and we will know our winner in two months.

In other news, preparations for next year's competition have begun with a brainstorming thread. Please, feel free to drop by and share any thoughts you have about how the competition should work next year. Sign ups are not yet open, but will be opened in due course. Watch this space. Further, there has been a discussion about the rule whereby those in the WikiCup must delcare their participation when nominating articles at featured article candidates. This has resulted in a bot being created by new featured article delegate. The bot will leave a message on FAC pages if the nominator is a participant in the WikiCup.

A reminder of the rules: any points scored after August 29 may be claimed for the final round, and please remember to update submission pages promptly. If you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 00:11, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Whatever It Takes GA
Congrats, passed :) --FeuDeJoie (talk) 11:03, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

You and Me GA
I've reviewed and accepted the article; great job on it and the other Lifehouse articles. :)  Toa   Nidhiki  05  20:48, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 September newsletter
We are on this year's home straight, with less than a month to go until the winner of the 2011 WikiCup will be decided. The fight for first place is currently being contested by, and , all of whom have over 200 points. This round has already seen multiple featured articles (1991 Atlantic hurricane season from Hurricanehink and Northrop YF-23 from Sp33dyphil) and a double-scoring featured list (Miyagawa's 1948 Summer Olympics medal table). The scores will likely increase far further before the end of the round on October 31 as everyone ups their pace. There is not much more to say- thoughts about next year's competition are welcome on the WikiCup talk page or the scoring talk page, and signups will open once a few things have been sorted out.

If you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 12:50, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Sick Cycle Carousel
I passed the article. Good job!  Toa   Nidhiki  05  01:20, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 October newsletter
The 2011 WikiCup is now over, and our new champion is, who joins the exclusive club of the previous winners: (2007),  (2008),  (2009) and  (2010). The final standings were as follows:



Prizes for first, second, third and fourth will be awarded, as will prizes for all those who reached the final eight. Every participant who scored in the competition will receive a ribbon of participation. In addition to the prizes based on placement, the following special prizes will be awarded based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, the prize is awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round.


 * The Featured Article Award:, for his performance in round 2. matched the score, but Casliber won the tiebreaker.
 * The Good Article Award:, for his performance in round 4.
 * The Featured List Award:, for his performance in round 4. matched the score, but Miyagawa won the tiebreaker.
 * The Recognised Topic Award (for good and featured topics):, for his performance in round 3.
 * The Did You Know Award:, for his performance in round 1.
 * The In the News Award:, for his performance in round 1.
 * The Reviewer Award (for good article reviews):, for his performance in round 3.

No prize was awarded for featured pictures, sounds or portals, as none were claimed throughout the competition. The awards will be handed out over the next few days. Congratulations to all our participants, and especially our winners; we've all had fun, and Wikipedia has benefitted massively from our content work.

Preparation for next year's WikiCup is ongoing. Interested parties are invited to sign up and participate in our straw polls. It's been a pleasure to work with you all this year, and, whoever's taking part in and running the competition in 2012, we hope to see you all in January! J Milburn and The ed17 00:48, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

2012 WikiCup
Hi! As you've previously expressed interest in the competition, I'm just letting you know that the 2012 WikiCup is due to start in less than 24 hours. Signups are open, and will remain so for a few weeks after the beginning of the competition. The competition itself will follow basically the same format as last year, with a few small tweaks to point costs to reflect the opinions of the community. If you're interested in taking part, you're more than welcome, and if you know anyone who might be, please let them know too- the more the merrier! To join, simply add your name to WikiCup/2012 signups, and we will be in touch. Please feel free to direct any questions to me, or leave a note on the WikiCup talk page. Thanks! You are receiving this note as you are listed on WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Please feel free to add or remove yourself. EdwardsBot (talk) 01:25, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 January newsletter
WikiCup 2012 is off to a flying start. At the time of writing, we have 112 contestants; comparable to last year, but slightly fewer than 2010. Signups will remain open for another week, after which time they will be closed for this year. Our currrent far-away leader is, due mostly to his work on a slew of good articles about The X-Files; there remain many such articles waiting to be reviewed at good article candidates. Second place is currently held by, whose points come mostly from good articles about television episodes, although good article reviews, did you knows and an article about a baroness round out the score. In third place is, who has scored 200 points for his work on a single featured article, as well as points for work on others, mostly in the area of pop music. In all, nine users have 100 or more points. However, at the other end of the scale, there are still dozens of participants who are yet to score. Please remember to update your submission pages promptly!

The 64 highest scoring participants will advance to round 2 in a month's time. There, they will be split into eight random groups of eight. The score needed to reach the next round is not at all clear; last year, 8 points guaranteed a place. The year before, 20.

A few participants and their work warrant a mention for achieving "firsts" in this competition.
 * was the first to score, with his good article review of Illinois v. McArthur.
 * was also the first to score points for an article, thanks to his work on Hurricane Debby (1982)- now a good article. Tropical storms have featured heavily in the Cup, and good articles currently have a relatively fast turnaround time for reviews.
 * was the first to score points for a did you know, with Russian submarine K-114 Tula. Military history is another subject which has seen a lot of Cup activity.
 * is also the first person to successfully claim bonus points. Terminator 2: Judgment Day is now a good article, and was eligible for bonus points because the subject was covered on more than 20 other Wikipedias at the start of the competition. It is fantastic to see bonus points being claimed so early!
 * was the first to score points for an In the News entry, with Paedophryne amauensis. The lead image from the article was also used on the main page for a time, and it's certainly eye-catching!
 * was the first to score points for a featured article, and is, at the moment, the only competitor to claim for one. The article, "Halo" (Beyoncé Knowles song), was also worth double points because of its wide coverage. While this is an article that Jivesh and others have worked on for some time, it is undeniable that he has put considerable work into it this year, pushing it over the edge.

We are yet to see any featured lists, featured topics or good topics, but this is unsurprising; firstly, the nomination processes with each of these can take some time, and, secondly, it can take a considerable amount of time to work content to this level. In a similar vein, we have seen only one featured article. The requirement that content must have been worked on this year to be eligible means that we did not expect to see these at the start of the competition. No points have been claimed for featured portals or pictures, but these are not content types which are often claimed; the former has never made a big impact on the WikiCup, while the latter has not done so since 2009's competition.

A quick rules clarification before the regular notices: If you are concerned that another user is claiming points inappropriately, please contact a judge to take a look at the article. Competitors policing one another can create a bad atmosphere, and may lead to inconsistencies and mistakes. Rest assured that we, the judges, are making an effort to check submissions, but it is possible that we will miss something. On a loosely related note: If you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 00:16, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Lenny Hambro quick-fail
Please see my comments addressing your quick fail of Lenny Hambro. CarlitosCorazon 19:26, 18 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by CharleyHart (talk • contribs)

WikiCup 2012 February newsletter
Round 1 is already over! The 64 highest scorers have progressed to round 2. Our highest scorer was, again thanks mostly to a swathe of good articles on The X-Files. In second place was, thanks an impressive list of did you knows about racehorses. Both scored over 400 points. Following behind with over 300 points were, , and. February also saw the competition's first featured list: List of colleges and universities in North Dakota, from. At the other end of the scale, 11 points was enough to secure a place in this round, and some contestants with 10 points made it into the round on a tiebreaker. This is higher than the 8 points that were needed last year, but lower than the 20 points required the year before. The number of points required to progress to round 3 will be significantly higher.

The remaining contestants have been split into 8 pools of 8, named A through H. Round two will finish in two months time on 28 April, when the two highest scorers in each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers, will progress to round 3. The pools were entirely random, so while some pools may end up being more competitive than others, this is by chance rather than design.

The judges would like to point out two quick rules reminders. First, any content promoted during the interim period (that is, on or after 27 February) is eligible for points in round 2. Second, any content worked on significantly this year is eligible for points if promoted in this round. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which would otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:06, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 March newsletter
We are over half way through the second round of this year's WikiCup and things are going well! , of Pool B, is our highest overall scorer thanks to his prolific writings on television and film. In second place is Pool H's, thanks primarily to work on biological articles, especially in marine biology and herpetology. Third place goes to Pool E's, who also writes primarily on biology (including ornithology and botany) and has already submitted two featured articles this round. Of the 63 contestants remaining, 15 (just under a quarter) have over 100 points this round. However, 25 are yet to score. Please remember to update your submission pages promptly. 32 contestants, the top two from each pool and the 16 next-highest scorers, will advance to round 3.

Congratulations to, whose impressive File:Wacht am Rhein map (Opaque).svg became the competition's first featured picture. Also, congratulations to, who claimed good topic points, our first contestant this year to do so, for his work on Featured topics/1982 Atlantic hurricane season. This leaves featured topics and featured portals as the only sources of points not yet utilised. However, as recent statistics from show, no source has yet been utilised this competition to the same extent it has been previously!

It has been observed that the backlogs at good article candidates are building up again. While the points for good article reviews will be remaining constant, any help that can be offered keeping the backlog down would be appreciated. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:26, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Here We Go Again (Ray Charles song)/archive3
You commented at the GAC, so as a courtesy, I am notifying you of Featured article candidates/Here We Go Again (Ray Charles song)/archive3.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 12:51, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 April newsletter
Round 2 of this year's WikiCup is over, and so we are down to our final 32, in what could be called our quarter-finals. The two highest scorers from each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers overall, have entered round 3, while 30 participants have been eliminated. Pool B's remains our top scorer with over 700 points; he continues to gain high numbers of points for his good articles on The X-Files, but also Millennium and other subjects. He has also gained points for a good topic, a featured list, multiple good article reviews and several did you knows. Pool E's was second, thanks primarily to his biology articles, with Pool H's  coming in third, with an impressive 46 did you knows, mostly on the subject of baseball. Casliber and Cwmhiraeth both scored over 600 points. Pools E and H proved our most successful, with each seeing 5 members qualify for round 3, while Pools C and D were the least, with each seeing only 3 reach round 3. However, it was Pool G which saw the lowest scoring, with a little under 400 points combined; Pool H, the highest scoring group, saw over triple that score.

65 points was the lowest qualifying score for round 3; significantly higher than the 11 required to enter round 2, and also higher than the 41 required to reach round 3 last year. However, in 2010, 100 points were needed to secure a place in round 3. 16 will progress to round 4. In round 3, 150 points was the 16th highest score, though, statistically, people tend to up their game a little in later rounds. Last year, 76 points secured a place, while in 2010, a massive 250 points were needed. Guessing how many points will be required is not easy. We still have not seen any featured portals or topics this year, but, on the subject of less common content types, a small correction needs to be made to the previous newsletter: File:Wacht am Rhein map (Opaque).svg, our first featured picture, was the work of both and, the latter of whom has also gone on to score with File:Map of the Battle of Guam, 1944.svg. Bonus points also continue to roll in; this round, earned triple points for her good articles on William the Conqueror and the Middle Ages, Casliber and Cwmhiraeth both earned triple points for their work on Western Jackdaw, now a good article,  earned triple points for her work on lettuce and work by  to ready antimony for good article status earned him triple points. managed to expand Vitus Bering far enough for a did you know, which was also worth triple points. All of these highly important topics featured on 50 or more Wikipedias at the start of the year.

An article on the WikiCup in the Wikimedia Blog, "Improving Wikipedia with friendly competition", was posted at the end of April. This may be of interest to those who are signed up to this newsletter, as well as serving as another way to draw attention to our project. Also, we would again like to thank and, for continued help behind the scenes. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:19, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:You and Me - Lifehouse.ogg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:You and Me - Lifehouse.ogg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:16, 19 May 2012 (UTC)