User talk:Rpaigu/Archive 6

Welcome!

 * }

Re: Permission
Hi, i've responded here. Joyson Prabhu Holla at me!   02:59, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rj anirudh


The article Rj anirudh has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Has yet to release a movie. Radio jockey is not notable.  Article has been deleted before at AfD.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 23:20, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Rj anirudh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rj anirudh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rj anirudh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 18:46, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25
Hi. When you recently edited Mohone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kalyan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:29, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia for World Heritage
I need your assistance in developing and spreading a wikiproject. Can you help me in developing and spreading this page in wikipedia:

Thank you and Happy editing  Yash t  101  :)  06:29, 26 March 2012 (UTC)


 * No problem. I know that studies and wiki get mixed up and its tuff studying enger. Anyways, I'd love if you could add your name here: Wikipedia for World Heritage and also tell your wiki friends about this project. Thanks!  Yash  t  101   16:28, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Your request for help
Thanks for your note. I am out of town, with limited time for Wikipedia today and tomorrow.

I've looked quickly at Uttar Pradesh and I'm not understanding what you believe is a problem. I see one IP, 131.111.121.37, making good edits. I see another one, 122.168.96.123, who tried to add an image, didn't do it correctly, and removed it.

That doesn't seem alarming to me. Am I missing something? SPhilbrick (Talk)  12:14, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I see your note at my talk page; I think I misunderstood your initial question, I have a better understanding now. Limited time until later today, but will follow up later.-- SPhilbrick (Talk)  11:42, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nyce Nadia


A tag has been placed on Nyce Nadia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pichpich (talk) 15:11, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sandra Shine


A tag has been placed on Sandra Shine, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:01, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Sandra Shine
Hi, this has been deleted as it had already been deleted as per Articles for deletion/Sandra Shine and the recreated article did not add substantially to the original article. Please take on the comments in the AFD page and, if you think the subject can satisfy the criteria in Notability, I suggest you take it to Deletion review.  Catfish  Jim  and the soapdish  20:52, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Divya Bharati
Hi! Saw your edits on the article. But they aren't all good. You should not remove the "citation needed" tags placed on the article without providing the citations. Also most important, this is ENCYCLOPEDIA. Not some fan forum. Hence stuff like "her film roles along with her screen persona contributed to a change in the concept of a Hindi film heroine", " Bharti was also an expert driver", "With her parents' permission, she signed up for both films", "That was the green signal for other film makers to enter the fray." and what not, should not be here. I am simply gonna revert your all edits. Sorry for that. But you should seriously first learn how these articles should be. You might wanna go through some better articles about Indian actresses. Try Dimple Kapadia, Preity Zinta, Vidya Balan, etc. Also go through what Reliable Sources are. IMDB, Flicker, enotes.com, gundogtimes.com, popcorn.oneindia.com are not reliable sources. In case of doubt feel free to ask me or any other experienced editors. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 18:46, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Well i am glad you are interested in learning. I will try and simplify as many things as possible. Even if tedious and boring i would still say that you go through the WP policies. (They really are boring and written in least friendly way. But if you happen to go through them many times over period of your editing you would start understanding them.)
 * IMBD is not a completely reliable source. It can be used to verify in which films the actors have worked, what their character's name was, which year the film released, etc. But it certainly cant be used as a reference to their DOB, DOD, religion, marital status, such personal things.
 * Policies about Biographies are quite strict than other articles like films, tv serials, animals, dams, temples, etc. Those for living people are even stricter. You would find them at WP:BLP.
 * Reliable sources in short would mean sources like newspapers, books, etc. They are called so as they are reliable in some sort. They (assumingly) go through various reviews before coming out in the form we see. Hence they can be relied upon for the information they give. Also, not all newspapers and books are RS. Some just dont do their job well. Some sources can be considered as RS for a particular thing but not all things. Eg: A person who is expert in archaeology, Indian history of British era, etc. can not be considered as a good sources for commenting on global warming or autopsy. Hence psychological interpretations about suicide given by a DCP cannot be included. Also the site which you refer to http://www.divyabhartiportal.com/ as her official site doesnt seem to be "her" official site. I couldn't find anything that said the site was managed by someone related to Bharati. It could very well be by some fan. Also if it were managed by her, it being self-published, cant be relied on everything. If i open my website i would put on it that i won National Film Award for Best Director! Hence self-published sources are also not good sources for all things. They can of course be used for things like where he studied, studied upto what, lived where, etc. things.
 * Encyclopedia should not be filled with trivial things. Now if she was a good driver or not doesn't matter. Do you thing Salman Khan, Rahul Gandhi, Drew Barrymore cant drive properly and hence no one has written about that on their articles? Things like these should not be inculded.
 * (You may reply here itself. I have your page on watchlist now. Will surely reply you.) §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:07, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

thanks a lot friend.I have better understanding now.actually want to make her article without any lack tag notice and all. will develop that page in according to manner it demands.thanks. Rpaigu (talk) 13:11, 13 May 2012 (UTC)