User talk:Rpatel74/sandbox

This is Heather Brown reviewing. This is a great page! Very detailed and all the sections are present. I do want to know what "mechanical abuse" means in the "Symptoms" sections. So perhaps trying to use more "lay" language would be helpful. Otherwise, this is very well done.

This is Khine Mon Swe. I think you did a great job. The article is very informative. However, I don't see the epidemiology in abstract. Khinems (talk) 03:43, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

I think you did a phenomenal job while keeping the article concise and yet informative. There are a few sections that could use hyperlinks to provide necessary definitions. Great job otherwise! Abolden03 (talk) 16:52, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Alexa Bolden

This is Kyriakos Papalexatos reviewing.Your article is good. I would add some more links within your article that link back to wikipedia for some words. This should be done for readers who might not understand all the words within your article in order to piece things together accurately. I would add a couple more pictures, specifically with a size reference. Also if you could find some more recent research that would be great for anyone reading. Your article is great overall. Kyriakos Papalexatos

--Sweiner02 (talk) 04:51, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Nice, clear abstract.
 * Needs LOTS more links to other articles.
 * What's up with the ellipsis?
 * Cite your sources!
 * For little things like dermascope, better to link that try to explain so briefly.
 * More recent research needed.