User talk:Rpche

August 2010
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Velvet Rose. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 16:24, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Velvet Rose. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Epbr123 (talk) 19:22, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Velvet Rose. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''An advertisement by an escort service is insufficient for WP:BLP services, especially since they are known to advertise people who are not present. For instance, I remember seeing one service in the Toronto area run an ad that used a picture of Asia Carrera with the statement "actual model"; implying she worked there (which was totally false). We need a source that's independent of the agency - for instance, has Velvet ever made mention in interviews that she escorts??'' Tabercil (talk) 21:09, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Velvet Rose. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tabercil (talk) 04:24, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Velvet Rose
Please stop - that escort advertisement website is in no way, shape or form a reliable source in my opinion for whether Velvet Rose is working as an escort. If you wish to dispute that decision, I would suggest taking the issue to the reliable source noticeboard where the issue can be decided by the Wikipedia community as a whole. Tabercil (talk) 17:19, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jeff spicoli.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Jeff spicoli.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:37, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. only (talk) 18:05, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Philip J. Kaplan. only (talk) 20:11, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Sigmund Freud
Could you please explain your edit summary here? Martinevans123 (talk) 19:52, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You seem to be pursuing your own religious agenda across multiple articles. Please stop using your edit summaries to accuse other editors of being "anti-Semites" and instead discuss at the appropriate Talk Pages. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:58, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Blocked for wrongthink
This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for committing the crime of wrongthink.