User talk:Rpkersbergen123

Welcome!
Hello, Rpkersbergen123, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Heart In Diamond, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Domdeparis (talk) 14:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Heart In Diamond


A tag has been placed on Heart In Diamond, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Domdeparis (talk) 14:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Heart In Diamond


A tag has been placed on Heart In Diamond, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. &mdash; Train2104 (t • c) 14:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi there. I noticed that you expressed a desire to work on Heart In Diamond to bring it in line with Wikipedia's standards: however, the page was too promotional to be left in the article space. I have therefore moved it to User:Rpkersbergen123/Heart In Diamond. You may work on it there at your leisure: but please do not move it back until it is truly compliant with WP:N and WP:NPOV, else it will likely be deleted. Vanamonde (talk) 10:18, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Heart In Diamond for deletion
This is a courtesy message to notify you that the article Heart In Diamond is being considered for deletion. All editors, including you, are welcome to discuss this at Articles for deletion/Heart In Diamond until a consensus is reached. The nomination and discussion are expected to focus on the quality of evidence and the policies and guidelines which are of concern. Please be aware that there are a number of arguments to avoid in a deletion discussion.

Users are encouraged to edit the article during the discussion, particularly in ways that address the concerns raised in that discussion. However, please do not attempt to remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article— doing so may be considered an act of bad faith and will not halt the deletion process. Thank you! Domdeparis (talk) 14:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:16, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Rpkersbergen123. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Exemplo347 (talk) 21:01, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Reply I already stated (twice) that there's no conflict of interest and that i am NOT working for Heart In Diamond. I also stated before that i have fully read conflict of interest guideline Nobody seems to really read my statements and just throw around templates on my beginners profile.

Articles for Deletion discussions are not "Speedy Deletions"
- Your arguments during Articles for Deletion discussions are invalid. You seem to be basing them on the Criteria for Speedy Deletion, which is a totally separate process. WP:A7 does not, in any way, apply to Articles for Deletion discussions and you're misinterpreting the other policies you are quoting. Have a read of WP:Articles for deletion - then read WP:GNG. I really really need to point out to you that you're confused about Wikipedia's policies. Exemplo347 (talk) 23:29, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Reply If you would have read my whole argumentation, you would see that 80% of my comments are actually valid for the "deletion" discussion as well.


 * I have definitely read through everything you've said - and it's clear to me that you've become confused about Wikipedia's policies. I've pointed out the correct policy to you (WP:GNG), and the page you should read for tips (WP:Articles for deletion).

You should not do the following:
 * 1) Edit using multiple accounts
 * 2) State Keep before every comment
 * 3) Quote policies or guidelines that you do not fully understand
 * 4) Respond to every comment with a long, long reply

You've already made your opinion clear in the discussion. My advice - just let the discussion run its course. Sooner or later, you're going to find yourself treated like a disruptive editor otherwise. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 23:39, 25 March 2017 (UTC)