User talk:Rpo.castro

<!--== Open proxy ==


 * It certainly was hosting an open proxy a few weeks ago, but I am unable to confirm whether it still is or not. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:27, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm using the same internet connection since 2013; It's not a public network (its my work network). In my pc, the IP adressed to me is one totally different from 185.58.82.6 (my IP starts with 178). I understand very little about internet connections, proxy's and so. Can you explain me how this IP (185.58.82.6) is related with me, I'm blocked from editing being logged in, and what can I do?Rpo.castro (talk) 17:48, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * There are several ways that the IP address registering on your computer may be different from the one that arrives at a remote site such as Wikipedia. However, whatever the exact details, the essential point is that your computer, instead of connecting directly to the public internet, sends its information to some other computer, which then puts that information onto the internet, using an IP address of its own, different from your computer's IP address. That process of connecting indirectly through another computer with another IP address is (basically) what connecting via a proxy means. The important question, though, is whether it is an open proxy, that is to say whether members of the public can access it. My statement that "it certainly was hosting an open proxy a few weeks ago" is based on the fact that the IP address is listed on web sites that provide lists of open proxies for people to use. However, I checked before posting my message above, and I have checked again now, and I am unable to find any confirmation that it is open at present. Unfortunately, that proves nothing, because some proxies are sometimes available and sometimes unavailable. My own inclination is to unblock the IP address, but there may be relevant information that is not available to me, so I shall consult a CheckUser first. I'm afraid this will mean a longer wait for you, and I'm sorry about that, but I hope it can be sorted out reasonably soon. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:40, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the explanation. I would appreciate very much if you could contact the chek user and help to figure out this situation, because its very annoying being blocked due to others issues. Rpo.castro (talk) 13:27, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Unblocked 185.58.82.6. Materialscientist (talk) 21:34, 5 February 2015 (UTC)


 * You may want to request IP block exemption. Origamiteⓣⓒ 14:50, 13 March 2015 (UTC)-->

Motorsport season template
It has occurred to me that it would be better to adjust the original template to remove season and then change the parameters on the articles that still use season in the title, rather than use a duplicate template with different defaults. Wikipedia generally doesn't like similar templates, and someone will likely merge the new one you created in time. QueenCake (talk) 23:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I've been having a look at the template, and it's fairly simple as there's already "if" conditions in place to do that. All we have to do is use the optional title and link fields. For example, for 1994 British Formula Three season:


 * This will produce exactly the same result as the one currently on the article. It's a simple matter then of removing season from the original template, which means we do not have to do anything on the majority of the articles which don't use season, once they have been moved. QueenCake (talk) 23:38, 10 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I wasn't actually aware that F1 has a different template. That will indeed have to be changed as well. In the meantime, I've restarted the process of moving articles. A long process perhaps, but we'll eventually get there. QueenCake (talk) 20:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I was planning to leave the articles as they were in the short term, until season gets removed from the template itself, which would automatically remove season from all those articles. QueenCake (talk) 21:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

List of Superbike World champions
http://www.worldsbk.com/en/results%20statistics/champions — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.28.134.198 (talk) 15:44, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

2019 World Touring Car Cup
OK, I want to clarify this with you - at the moment the team order for touring car season articles usually follow the traditional format with teams being ordered by the car numbers of their drivers. The format you've proposed, similar to ones used in recent World Rally Championship and Deutsche Tourenwagen Masters season articles, was removed, because although they're manufacturer supported teams, they're still classified as independent entries by the series organizers and the FIA.

If you want, we can discuss it.Ivaneurope (talk) 13:05, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Maybe we should discuss it on the article Talk page. Suppose we were writing at same time.Rpo.castro (talk) 13:07, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Supersport 300 World Championship has been accepted
 Supersport 300 World Championship, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 14:22, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Supersport_300_World_Championship help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Question on my reverted edit
Hello Rpo.castro. You recently reverted a change that I made to the Giro d'Italia page. My original reason for making this change is consistency. When locations and their countries are listed, we tend to list the country itself, and not go more specific than that. Northern Ireland is not a sovereign country; it is a region of the UK (which, inconveniently, labels most of its regions 'countries'). Listing Northern Ireland instead of the UK would be in the same vein as listing Flanders and Wallonia instead of Belgium. While it is indeed more precise, it is a level of detail that will become confusing if applied consistently.

At least, that's my 2 cents. So my question is: is there a reason for making an exception for the United Kingdom's countries that I am still missing? Arno Sluismans (talk) 09:20, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi. As I stated briefly in the reversion edit, Nothern Ireland is more precise then UK. We are not speaking about sporting licenses but locations, and most people will say that Belfast is in NIR, Glasgow in Scotland and not in UK. And Nothern Ireland is a country, as is Scotland or Wales, that are united under the United Kingdom that is the sovereign country . So both are locations are correct, but I think NIR is more precise. Plus the sources I found support NIR instead of UK as you can see here, here, or here or every video in Giro d'Italia 2014 official channel on youtube. If you look at last source it talks about how this event would enhace the image of NIR and the return of the investement, that I believe it was paid by NIR Executive (like here). And of course there is no comparison between the countries that are part of the UK (they are de facto countries) and regions in other countries. Rpo.castro (talk) 18:55, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your explanation. I disagree that there is no comparison between UK's countries and other nations' regions; even on Wikipedia it is documented that these are simply administrative divisions. The term "countries" may make it not seem so, but even this is not exceptional. Germany is comprised of Länder (literally: countries) as well, but we would not list Cologne as being a location in North Rhine-Westphalia.
 * I was hoping to find a consensus on Wikipedia about this, as such consistency cannot be expected from different external sources. Even on Wikipedia the usage seems to be quite mixed right now, so it looks like it's up to whoever writes the articles to decide. Since I am quite an infrequent editor I don't want to kick up too much dust about such a minor topic, so I will leave the page as it is (after you reverted my edit, that is). Arno Sluismans (talk) 03:31, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Scotland,NIR or Wales aren't simply administratives regions or divisions. They are countries unified under the same Kingdom. Every source will call it countries. If they aren't how could they have their National teams in most sports? Recognize by UK/England. And regarding to this particular situation, the 2014 Giro run solely in NIR and Ireland. Never in the biggest part of UK, so just stating UK would lead to wrong picture. This is my opinion. Like I said, both are right I think this way is better, but its just a detail. If you think this need to be discussed lets open a topic on article talk page and ask for different opinions. But this is a question of detail and personal preferences.Rpo.castro (talk) 11:01, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello again Rpo.castro. The confusion is understandable due to the nomenclature, as the word "country" in every other context tends to refer to independent nations. Wikipedia itself classifies Countries of the United Kingdom as being administrative divisions. Internationally, the countries of the UK tend to be treated similarly to how substates of federated countries are treated. Again, the examples of Germany and Belgium are a good way to illustrate this.
 * Your note about sports is not something we should draw conclusions from. Competitions where the UK's countries are represented separately (e.g. Football) are sports that originated in the UK, and where competitions between the home nations are in fact the historical origin of international competitions. In competitions that originate elsewhere (such as cycling, or the Olympic Games in general), the countries of the UK are not represented individually, as the criteria for representation roughly boil down to: you have to be a sovereign state.
 * Like I mentioned previously, I am okay with leaving the article as it is right now. I will leave it up to you if you think it can be worth getting second opinions on. Arno Sluismans (talk) 14:11, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

2021 Volta a Portugal
Do you have a reference to the Roadbook? It’s caused a dangling ref… it would be great to have a link to this. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 13:19, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * No I don't. It was a mistake when copying. The reference for the stages is one cited in the beggining. I will correct that.Rpo.castro (talk) 14:11, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I can fix a few articles now :-) Aussie Article Writer (talk) 23:28, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

CCC Pro Team
Hello, Rpo.castro,

I see you are requesting that the page CCC Pro Team be deleted so you can move a different article to this title. But when I looked at that page, the phrase "CCC Pro Team" doesn't appear anywhere in the article and "CCC" isn't even mentioned in the lead paragraph so I'm doubting that this is the current name of this team or, at least, how the team is known.

If I am wrong, can you please correct the lead paragraph so that it demonstrates that this team is now referred to by the title of the page where you want this article to be relocated to? Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 23:41, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Done. We were expecting to make the move first and then adapt. After we move Intermarché–Wanty–Gobert Matériaux to CCC, we will the former to be deleted do Circus–Wanty Gobert can be moved there. All was discussed in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cycling. Thank you.Rpo.castro (talk) 12:04, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Czech Cycling Tour
Hello I see you moved this page to Sazka Tour however we do not name race pages with the sponsor name i.e. Tour Down Under not Santos Tour Down Under. Also on the website for this race it is called Czech tour. . Also according to this message by sazka sponsor the race will be dropping Sazka name. Please revert your move. Thanks Paulpat99 (talk) 19:26, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Cycling team name edits
Thanks for your offer - slowly learning the convoluted way of editing it!

Not sure the best way to 1) create a new template page for Proximus-Alphamotorhomes-Doltcini 2) match up Torelli and Toronto Hustle because they seem to share the same code? 3) fix Massi Tactic (Massi–Tactic Women Team) which uses the MAT code ? Thanks! Turini2 (talk) 20:04, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi. 1)It's easy, just open a template from any team, copy and create the new one, changing the name and the years. Its very easy, few changes. I just created the template for Proximus which UCI code in CTW. Now you just need to create the article for the team (it's not really needed for the template to work, but it would be better). 2) Torelli answers for Torelli while Toronto answers for TOR 3) Massi–Tactic Women Team answers for MAT2. When you need to create or move a template to a new code that was already in use you have to call it other name, either the name of the team (Torelli), or xxx2. You can't have 2 with the same. Before you create, search for codes from previous years. It might be there but with an old designation. I hope I could help you. Any more doubts or just exchanging ideas, just write to me.Rpo.castro (talk) 20:43, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your help! Turini2 (talk) 21:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Roller hockey competitions in Australia


A tag has been placed on Category:Roller hockey competitions in Australia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 20:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC)