User talk:Rpulido7

Welcome!
Hello, Rpulido7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Lin Evola, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! red dog six (talk) 03:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Lin Evola


The article Lin Evola has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. red dog six (talk) 03:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lin Evola. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ''Please stop adding copyrighted images to Wikipedia.  red dog six''  (talk) 04:35, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * The continued addition of copyrighted images or text can get you banned from editing or creating article. PLEASE STOP DOING THIS!   red dog six  (talk) 13:44, 6 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Please stop adding in the section Most recognized work of art to the article Lin Evola without rewriting the text. Although not an exact copy, the text substantially is the same as in.

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Lin Evola. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. ''STOP ADDING IN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. The material you added to the section 'Most recognized work' is essentially a copy from the website listed in the above section. red dog six''  (talk) 01:00, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lin Evola, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your continual addition of copyrighted material will get you banned from WIkipedia editing I suggest you stop this disruptive behavior.  red dog six  (talk) 13:32, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * We can either work together to improve the article or we can work against each other. The text you are adding does not meet Wikipedia guidelines and will be removed.  Addtionally,you will be banned from editing if you continue your disruptive editing.  I suggest you take the hint and help me work to improve the article.  red dog six  (talk) 16:48, 7 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Why do you continue to add non-encyclopedic material? red dog six  (talk) 16:52, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
red dog six (talk) 18:09, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding caps to the titles of section. Per the Wikipedia MOS, unless it is a proper name only the first word is capiltized. red dog six (talk) 04:02, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Lin Evola, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Once more STOP ADDING CAPS TO SECTION TITLES. red dog six  (talk) 04:12, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

I'll say this only once more. We can work together on this article and improve it or you can work against that end. If you insist on ignoring my comments you will potentially lose your editing ability. Please stop the disruptive editing. red dog six (talk) 04:18, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Lin Evola
Please note I have removed a number of the "references" from the article and replaced them with a "citation needed" tag. The reason I removed the "references" is they failed to support the statement they were referencing. If one uses a reference on an article, it needs to support the statement. (e.g., if the statement says the sky is green, then the reference has to state the sky is green) red dog six  (talk) 11:43, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lin Evola, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. red dog six (talk) 23:37, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lin Evola. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 18:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)