User talk:Rreemmett

Your contributed article, '''Universal Monsters Cinematic Universe


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Universal Monsters Cinematic Universe'''. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Universal Monsters Cinematic Universe. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Universal Monsters Cinematic Universe - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. —  Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 14:27, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Universal Monsters Cinematic Universe, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Arthur and William Hurlbut. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of List of Universal Monsters characters
I have reverted your blanking and speedy deletion nomination of List of Universal Monsters characters. Blanking should only be done if the article is an attack page or negative unsourced BLP. The speedy deletion reason you gave is not a valid reason for speedy deletion and particularly not for an article that has existed for over 10 1/2 years. If you still wish to seek deletion of this article, please use either the Proposed Deletion process WP:PROD or the Articles for Deletion process WP:AFD instead. Thanks. Safiel (talk) 05:23, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Montreal Alouettes mascots Touché and Blitz.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Montreal Alouettes mascots Touché and Blitz.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nick&#8288;—&#8288;Contact/Contribs 23:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi. In the interest of not flooding your talk page with these notices, be advised that this applies to your other copyrighted photo uploads as well. Cheers, Nick&#8288;—&#8288;Contact/Contribs 23:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Universal Monsters Cinematic Universe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Hurlbut. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Universal Monsters
Hey. Your edits on the Universal Monsters Cinematic page are not official. The page is titled 'Universal Monsters Cinematic Universe' and thereby applies to the new rebooted shared universe. The original series is listed under Universal Monsters. If you feel there needs to be a separate page for the films that have shared continuity, then you need to make a new page for those films, or simply create a list at the bottom of the page listing the films as a 'series'. At no point were the original films called a cinematic universe. Do not change the page again before making comments on the talk page. These two series are completely separate entities.

Burningblue52 (talk) 03:57, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Sign your posts when you post on my talk board, and also wanted you to know that it is not legal, nor by Wikipedia standards to claim creat('coin')-ing a series' name. That's hearsay and fluff in all actuality. Burningblue52 (talk) 06:34, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

By the way, F.Y.I. -- the Invisible Man is actually a part of the Universal Monster Movies; as he appeared in a brief cameo in Bud Abbott and Lou Costello Meet Frankenstein marking Vincent Price's return to the role. Just thought you'd like to know for future trivia purposes.

Burningblue52 (talk) 06:44, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

By the way, F.Y.I -- Gwynplaine, in "The Man Who Laughs" is a universal monster the same way that "Quasimodo" is. What evidence do you have to support the claim that this character is not? Pitzmans0110 (talk) 05:27, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Canadian Football League while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address per person. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. TDL (talk) 02:01, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (List of Calgary Bronks (football) seasons) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating List of Calgary Bronks (football) seasons, Rreemmett!

Wikipedia editor Maharayamui just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Add references to make the article fully conform to Wikipedia Manual of style and the WP:5P"

To reply, leave a comment on Maharayamui's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

April 2017
Please stop making disruptive edits. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Total-Truth-Teller-24 (talk) 21:33, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Ways to improve List of fictional shared universes in film
Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Rreemmett, thanks for creating List of fictional shared universes in film!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article needs references to independent, reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 03:49, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of professional sports team owners, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bob Young. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Universal Monsters (2017 film series) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Universal Monsters (2017 film series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Universal Monsters (2017 film series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rob Sinden (talk) 13:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of fictional shared universes in film. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Nurseline247 (talk) 21:48, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please discuss your continued removal of entries on List of fictional shared universes in film and television
Discuss it here with everyone else. It needs to be decided publicly -- by repeatedly removing those entries you are demonstrating an inability to work with others and are wasting both of our time. I'd also like to mention that curating an article for years does not mean you're right 100% of the time. -- sarysa (talk) 14:58, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Canadian Football League. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. When you are told to take it to the talk page, you do not keep reverting. Especially when it's a change that was previously discussed and rejected, and that removes definitive, official sources. Frankly, you should. E topic banned from this, because you cannot accept consensus is against you. Either that, or blocked indefinitely. oknazevad (talk) 13:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notification of deletion discussion
I am writing to inform you, being the article creator, that the article Dark Universe (film studio) is currently nominated for deletion. If you wish to participate, the discussion can be found here.

Disambiguation link notification for December 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Grey Cup-winning head coaches, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamilton. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 13 December 2021 (UTC)