User talk:Rriggs2/sandbox

INSTRUCTOR FEEDBACK
You are well on your way to a first-rate page here. I think you're definitely on the right track and I would only encourage you to provide more detail about each of the critical formations and about why they make this a viable petroleum system. If you have any information about quality of the source rocks, such as the organic carbon content or the porosity and permeability of the main reservoirs you could add in something like that. My main criticism is that you don't seem to provide enough information but I think the organization is essentially ideal Pclift (talk) 17:37, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

STUDENT FEEDBACK (Kojo Orgle)
Overall, the content of your wikipedia page is great. You have significant information concerning the geology and hydrocarbon potential of the field. The structure could be better. It would look more organized if you were to have a small introductory section about the field. Also it would be great if you were to add a more visible picture of the stratigraphic column than the one you have up now. The division of subsections under petroleum geology seems a bit excessive and not necessary to separate. I would suggest combining these subsections with relevant transitions. In your production section, good if you provided how much the field is producing today. Other than that, the content and the resources look good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kojoorgle (talk • contribs) 18:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)