User talk:Rrindie126

October 2008
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. The author of the page has requested that it be deleted at Articles for deletion/Dominic Luciano. MuZemike  ( talk ) 21:08, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Quixotic92 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Alexius08 (talk) 23:19, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. MuZemike ( talk ) 01:38, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to User talk:MuZemike. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 02:47, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below.


 * But you haven't really objected to moderator and admin viewpoints in any significant way. All you've done is disrupt a single deletion discussion.  Who would bother to slander you?  -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:25, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Ok a couple things here:

1. I disrupted nothing. The definition of disruption in Wikipedia terms is "Anything that does not abide to the beliefs of the administrators (See also: Objection to Deletion)".

2. I have objected to mod and admin viewpoints because I OPPOSED THE DELETION. All of you DIDN'T. Voting to keep and delete are complete polar opposites, are they not?

3. You and your admins would bother. Please do not take that offensively, but I say that because it looks as if you were the one who nailed down the ban, and it also seems you have not read the logs and discussions. Also I have LEGITIMATE 3RD PARTY PROOF that even Wikipedia's founders have slandered and wrongfully blocked people.

So all I'm trying to really do is help you guys. I am getting ready to kick off a Wikipedia "reform" campaign tomorrow. I was asked to actually lecture a college class on the downside and corruption of Wikipedia, and I intend to do it. Now I can go easy, or I can play hardball and probably get Wikipedia blocked by my college, even though blocking in a college institution is illegal.

And don't come back and tell me that's an attack. If you wanna see an attack, I can point you to a page where an admin attacked ME.

I have done absolutely nothing wrong so thanks for the unblock. --Rrindie126 (talk) 21:40, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd love to see the video of the class you're lecturing. If you put it on youtube, I hope you'll send me a link.  -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:43, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Fisher, don't feed the fire. He doesn't get that the checkuser is not able to be overturned. He's blocked as he should be. Undead Warrior (talk) 14:18, 10 October 2008 (UTC)