User talk:Rrmmll22

Proposed deletion of Michael Finnerty


The article Michael Finnerty has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "GNG fail. He is in two collections: a hospital and a local museum in Australia. Neither appear to be notable enough for WP:ARTIST. There seem to be no reviews or other sourcing available. This would not survive a deletion discussion."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --- Possibly &#9742; 22:55, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Michael Finnerty for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Finnerty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Michael Finnerty until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --- Possibly &#9742; 03:24, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Cullen328  Let's discuss it  00:23, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at David Oliver (magician) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Theroadislong (talk) 20:43, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Retaliatory AfD
What you did at Sanlé Sory with the AfD is really something you should try to avoid. It's obviously retaliatory, after I made a good argument for deletion at Michael Finnerty. Finally, if you are going to nominate artists for deletion, make sure they are not in the collection of MoMA, which is likely the most notable art museum in the US. --- Possibly &#9742; 05:08, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * OK I see now that you also retaliated by launching another bad faith AFD, for the article I created on Jeongmee Yoon. I am not sure if this is what was notifying you about above, but retaliatory AFDs (and for obviously notable articles) are not acceptable. They are also a big waste of editor time.  --- Possibly &#9742; 05:20, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jon Burge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norwegian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

WP:BLP policy.
I'd strongly advise against edit-warring to restore a violation of WP:BLP policy into the David Oliver (magician) article. Regardless of the circumstances, it is liable to result in you being blocked from editing. Updating the article can wait for a few days until policy-compliant sourcing can be found. AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:36, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:47, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Rrmmll22. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 00:46, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Michael Holland linden hill school.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Michael Holland linden hill school.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 9 July 2023 (UTC)