User talk:Rroneice

September 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Keith Clizark has been reverted. Your edit here to Keith Clizark was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://thehypemagazine.blogspot.com/2012/05/keith-clizark-interview-wthe-hype.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:02, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Keith Clizark have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to Keith Clizark was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Keith Clizark


A tag has been placed on Keith Clizark, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Melcous (talk) 08:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Reply
Hi and thanks for your message on my talk page. Wikipedia doesn't exist to "give people credit" - it is as an encyclopaedia which contains facts that are notable and verifiable, backed up by reliable, independent sources. If these can't be found, then the article will be deleted as this one was. Please don't re-create it again. If you are able to find better sources in the future, then the best suggestion would be to create a draft article which can be worked on over time and receive feedback from other editors, meaning it is much less likely to be deleted. Cheers, Melcous (talk) 14:17, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi again. If you create a draft, I'm happy to have a look and give some feedback or help you with formatting etc before you submit it for review. Just let me know when you're at a stage when you've done that and want me to have a look. If you have not already started, the best starting point is to go to WP:AFC and follow the steps, making sure you read the advice given along the way on how to make sure your article will meet the guidelines, and then creating a draft. In regards to your other question, a WP:WIKILINK will be in blue only if there is an article on the person in wikipedia to point to, which in Clizark's case there is not as yet. Cheers, Melcous (talk) 01:04, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you :).Rroneice (talk) 10:33, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I submitted for review, but I am also going to paste it here for you to have a look at. Rroneice (talk) 12:05, 17 September 2016 (UTC) Keith Clizark (born Keith Clark) is a music producer, engineer, composer, song writer, and programmer from the United States. His works consists of West Coast Hip Hop. He has produced, co-produced, wrote, composed, and engineered for artists such as, Snoop Dogg, Tha Eastsidaz, and B-Legit among others. At the age of four Clizark relocated with his mother, Shirley Clark, from Greenville, Mississippi to Long Beach, California. Keith gained an interest in music after hearing Parliament Funkadelic’s “Flashlight” played at his Aunt Barbara's family gathering. A few years later Hip Hop was born. Keith used Hip Hop as the catalyst to creatively express himself musically. The name “Clizark” was coined from his love of Mozart. Clizark began his career in the early 1980’s as a Disc Jockey with the group Beat Control. At age 17 Clizark and his Beat Control Crew began working for Rory Koffman at the first most popular Hip Hop radio station located in Los Angeles, 1580 KDAY. From 1986-1989 Clizark attended Long Beach City College majoring in Music Theory/Business. In 1991 Clizark landed his first major label placement with Capitol Records for "You Ain't All That" by group 3-D which reached Billboard’s Top Ten Dance Spot. In 1996 Clizark produced The Dove Shack’s “Summertime in the LBC” (Remix). In 1998 Clizark was a writer and Producer on Snoop Dogg’s The Game is to Be Sold, Not to be Told. In 1999 Clizark produced and engineered on B-Legit’s Hempin’ Ain’t Easy Album. Also in 1999 Clizark produced on TRU’s Da Crime Family Album. He produced on the 1999 Thicker Than Water (Soundtrack). In 2000 Clizark produced on The Eastsidaz (Album) “Tha G in Deee”. Clizark produced “Go Away” featuring Kokane on Snoop Dogg’s Tha Last Meal (2000) which debuted on the US Billboard 200. In 2001 Clizark produced “Now Is the Time” on the Tha Eastsidaz Duces ‘n Trays: The Old Fashioned Way and What’s the Worst That Could Happen? [Original Soundtrack]. Also in 2001 Clizark was a music programmer on The Brothers [2001] Original Soundtrack. In 2002 Clizark produced on Snoop Dogg’s Paid tha Cost to Be Da Bo$$ which debuted at number 12 on the US Billboard 200, becoming certified platinum by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA). In 2011 Clizark created the “Platinum Essentials” for Big Fish Audio. From 2010-Current Clizark has produced music and directed music videos for various artists.

Produced, Composed, Engineered, and Wrote Songs (Highlights) 3-D “You Ain’t All That” (1991) Composer-Label: Capitol Records-DPRO-79831 Snoop Dogg - "C You when I Get There" feat. Mystical,C- Murder, Silk The Shocker and Master P (1998) Writer-Producer-Label: No Limit-Priority B-Legit - "The Game Be Cold" feat. Snoop Dogg (1999) Engineer, Producer-Label: Koch Records, Sic Wid It Records B-Legit - "Where the Gangstas At" feat. Kurupt, Mack 10 (1999) Engineer, Producer-Label: Koch Records, Sic Wid It Records Snoop Dogg - "Go Away" (2000) Producer-Label: No Limit Records-Doggystyle The Eastsidaz - "The G in D" feat. Snoop Dogg (2000) Producer-Label: Dogghouse-TVT The Eastsidaz - "Now's the Time" Feat. Kocane (2001) Producer-Label: Doggystyle-TVT Snoop Dogg - "Suited and Booted" (2002) Writer, Producer-Label: Doggystyle- Priority-Capitol Snoop Dogg- "Fu@! what They Say" (2001) Instrumentation, Producer-Label: Priority

Filmography (Highlights) Thicker Than Water (1999)-[Soundtrack] (Producer) Label: Hoo-Bangin’ Priority The Brothers (2001)-[Original Soundtrack] (Programming) Label: Warner What’s the Worst That Could Happen (2001) [Original Soundtrack] (Instrumentation, Producer) Label: Priority

Project Highlights 	1991 You Ain’t All That (Radio Mix) 3D-Producer, Composer 	1991 You Ain’t All That (Original Mix) 3D-Producer, Composer 	1991 You Ain’t All That (Radio Mix with Rap) 3D-Producer, Composer 	1991 You Ain’t All That (Original Mix with Rap) 3D-Producer, Composer 	1991 You Ain’t All That (Club Mix) 3D-Producer, Composer 	1991 You Ain’t All That (Instrumental) 3D-Producer, Composer 	1996 Summer Time in The LBC (Remix) The Dove Shack-Producer 	1998 Da Game is to Be Sold, not to Be Told-Snoop Dogg-Writer, Producer 	1999 Hempin’ Ain’t Easy-B Legit-Engineer, Producer 	1999 Thick Than Water [Soundtrack] Producer 	2000 Tha Eastsidaz (Album) Tha Eastsidaz-Producer 	2000 The Last Meal-Snoop Dogg-Producer 	2001 Duces ‘N Trayz: The Old Fashioned Way-Tha Eastsidaz-Producer 	2001 The Brothers [Original Soundtrack] Programming 	2001 What’s The Worst That Could Happen? [Original Soundtrack] Instrumentation, Producer 	2002 Paid Da Cost to Be Da Bo$$-Snoop Dogg-Producer 	2011 Preserved-Young Bleed-Composer, Mixer, Producer 	Fu@! What They Say-Snoop Lion-Writer

References https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brothers_(soundtrack) http://www.allmusic.com/album/the-brothers-2001-mw0000586643/credits https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Da_Game_Is_to_Be_Sold,_Not_to_Be_Told#Track_listing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Da_Game_Is_to_Be_Sold,_Not_to_Be_Told https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duces_%27n_Trayz:_The_Old_Fashioned_Way https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duces_%27n_Trayz:_The_Old_Fashioned_Way#Track_listing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tha_Eastsidaz_(album)#Track_listing http://www.emusician.com/gear/1332/keith-clark/37327 http://www.allmusic.com/album/hempin-aint-easy-mw0000257342/credits https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hempin%27_Ain%27t_Easy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KDAY http://www.allmusic.com/album/paid-tha-cost-to-be-da-bo-mw0000662689/credits https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paid_tha_Cost_to_Be_da_Boss https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paid_tha_Cost_to_Be_da_Boss#Track_listing http://www.allmusic.com/album/preserved-mw0002219108/credits https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tha_Last_Meal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tha_Last_Meal#Track_listing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thicker_than_Water_(soundtrack) http://www.allmusic.com/album/whats-the-worst-that-could-happen-mw0000006703 http://www.allmusic.com/album/whats-the-worst-that-could-happen-mw0000006703/credits https://www.discogs.com/3D-You-Aint-All-That/release/2257604

Categories: Living People/ American Record Producer

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keith Clizark (September 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abdullah Alam was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Rroneice/sandbox/Keith Clizark and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Rroneice/sandbox/Keith_Clizark Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Abdullah_Alam&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Rroneice/sandbox/Keith_Clizark reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Abdullah Alam (talk) 12:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Response
Hi and thanks for your message on my talk page. I have moved the article to draftspace as it is not yet ready to be an article and would likely get deleted yet again. You need to slow down and understand what needs to happen before the article is ready. You said that you waited for community input and got none, but as far as I can see, your draft submission was not accepted, you got feedback on why, then you recreated it in your sandbox and within 12 hours moved it back to mainspace as an article. That is just not enough time to allow other editors to help. There is no rush on wikipedia. I will have a go at editing the draft over the next couple of days, and I suggest you also take some time to work on it as well - you have not yet correctly understood how to add references and format articles. I'm not sure that you have established notability either. Please read the articles linked to, and maybe look at some other articles to learn how wikipedia works. Thank you, Melcous (talk) 13:03, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for responding. I went back and removed all of that page and started completely over. Could you only edit/use the last page I submitted and I do appreciate your help.Rroneice (talk) 13:09, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure exactly what you are asking. At the moment there is both the draft in your sandbox and the draft article. If you would like one of these deleted so that you can work on the other one, then please place the following tag on the one you want deleted: Cheers, Melcous (talk) 13:39, 18 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi, sorry I'm not an administrator so I can't remove the block on the page sorry. You need to submit your draft for review and then once it has been reviewed and found to be ok, an administrator can make the article available. However, if you are talking about Draft:Keith "Clizark" Clark, it is not yet ready for review. I did the first reference for you, but the rest have not been properly formatted. You need to read WP:CITEFOOT and use the tags to create them properly. The information in the first paragraph is also too much - see WP:LEAD. Much of that should be moved to other heading such as "Early life and education" and "Career". Melcous (talk) 13:22, 23 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Hello again and thanks for your message. You have done some good work on tidying the article up and fixing the references. There are still a couple of places where you are missing the tags, in the section Early life after "Flashlight" and after "3D". Also, according to the Manual of style headings (e.g. Early life) should only have the first word capitalised, so you could fix that. With the first paragraph, you do not need a heading - that will be the lead section. You should, however, bold the name of the article in the text. Finally, what you need to do next is wait for your draft to be reviewed. has submitted the draft for review on your behalf, and you will see from the notice that this can take a couple of weeks, so be patient, and do make those little improvements while you are waiting. Cheers, Melcous (talk) 23:37, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keith "Clizark" Clark (November 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Garchy was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Keith "Clizark" Clark and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Garchy (talk) 03:31, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Keith Clizark


Hello, Rroneice. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Keith Clizark".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 05:54, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Keith "Clizark" Clark


Hello, Rroneice. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Keith "Clizark" Clark".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 15:39, 23 May 2017 (UTC)