User talk:Rrrathi

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Talent Neuron, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Coolboygcp (talk) 06:57, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Speedy deletion nomination of Talent Neuron


A tag has been placed on Talent Neuron, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  Dewritech (talk)  11:49, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Deletion
Lots of problems, it was tagged as a an advert and for lack of notability before I deleted it.
 * It did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Although you gave sources, they do not appear to meet the criteria as linked, and there was nothing in the article to show how the company is notable.
 * It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * The company was founded in 2011 by Vijay Swaminathan and Vamsee Tirukkala  - and that's it about the company. It's all about what the company does, little about the company itself. How many employees? Turnover? Profits? Has the company ever received negative publicity? Who are its competitors?
 * Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: assists companies in planning, building and managing talent... provides deeper characteristics on the external (industry) talent... over 25 unique data sources... Over 6 million unique data points... enable Talent Planning & Acquisition initiatives... consolidates HR data... to provide deeper characteristics on their employee data, deliver real time industry benchmarking, assist in hypotheses validation and enable predictive talent analytics.

 Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  13:13, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, you can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~.
 * you cannot use the Yahoo page. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. In this case the page is marked Copyright © 2013 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is far too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required.
 * You do not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines.
 * It is written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Your text is full of promotional claims lacking references to independent sources
 * it's all about what the company does, little about the company itself. Locations? How many employees? Turnover? Profits? Has the company ever received negative publicity? Who are its competitors?
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. Thank you for declaring your interest. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

 Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  10:19, 16 July 2013 (UTC)