User talk:Rsabbatini

Puccamp pics
Thanks for uploading Image:Puccamp1.jpg and Image:Puccamp2.jpg. I've been tagging images, and I came across these. Did you take the photos yourself? If not, where do they come from? Thanks,   – Quadell (talk) (help)   22:58, Nov 9, 2004 (UTC)

---

Hi, thanks, Quade11, They were taken from PUCCAMPs photo album on the Internet.

Image:Viracopos.jpg
Hi! Thanks for uploading Image:Viracopos.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GFDL, or  if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much,   – Quadell (talk) (help)   18:09, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Unverified images
Hi. You uploaded Image:Vital-brazil.jpg but did not list any source and/or copyright information on the image description page. Please mark it either as GFDL or public domain. See Image copyright tags for more info. Please note that images without copyright information may be deleted in the future. Thanks. RedWolf 03:50, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)


 * Hi, public domain image from the Brazilian federal government. User:Rsabbatini


 * Also Image:Linear-accelerator.jpg RedWolf 05:14, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

Transmissão oral do T. cruzi
Oi Renato,

li, através do Sciello, o texto original a que você se refere no adendo ao artigo Chagas disease. O artigo reporta o primeiro caso de megacólon em SC, onde a doença, não-endêmica apesar de encontrada em animais silvestres, só era conhecida como exógena e na forma de cardiopatia. Os autores, me parece, não inferam que a doença tenha sido contraída por via oral. Em que parte do texto você se baseou para afimar isto? Lígia
 * Ligia, quem colocou a referência não fui eu. Colocou errado, evidentemente. Eu já tirei do texto. User:Rsabbatini

Copyrights of images
I noticed you uploaded Image:Leksell2.jpg and Image:Stereotaxic-device.gif, but I don't see a source on them. I wondered if you could provide a source and a copyright tag for them. Cheers. Burgundavia 16:08, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)

Image:Langsdorff-expedition-chart.jpg
Burgundavia 23:21, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)

Image:Grigori-langsdorff.jpg
Burgundavia 23:49, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)


 * Status has been made clear. User:Rsabbatini

Image:Airboat.jpg
Burgundavia (&#9992; take a flight?) 11:06, May 22, 2005 (UTC)


 * Status has been made clear. User:Rsabbatini

Image source
Thank you for uploading Image:Sphygmomanometer.jpg. Its copyright status is unclear, so it may have to be deleted. Please leave a note on the image page about the source of the image. Thank you.


 * Status has been made clear. User:Rsabbatini

Image:Ferriermonkey.gif
Thank you for uploading Image:Ferriermonkey.gif. Its copyright status is unclear, so it may have to be deleted. Please leave a note on the image page about the source of the image. Thank you. --Kevin McManus 21:44, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * The same goes for Image:Ferrier.jpg. If you have the source and would like help on applying a copyright, feel free to leave a note on my Talk page.
 * Both were fixed, thanks. They are both old public domain (PD-old)

lots of edits, not an admin
Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 00:28, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)


 * Hi, Rick, thanks. I have done it. User:Rsabbatini

Interview
Hi. We worked together some in the Chagas disease article. Yesterday, I saw the program "Linha Direta", special edition named "Mistério". You were the "voice of science" in it, right? Congratulations on it!! If you ask me, though, the program wasn't really fair, since they had you as the only advocate for science, while several people were advocating the existence of ghosts, curses and similars. You did a great job, but it seemed to me that they portraid science as being some sort of minority... But it was great, how did you get invited for something like that?? Regards, Redux 2 July 2005 03:06 (UTC)


 * Hi, Redux, thanks. In my opinion it was an inglorious, but needed presence. I was chosen as a kind of an official excuse of the Globo TV (the producer of Linha Direta), like: "we have produced this hideous and slanted program, but, see: we have the other side, too". So, they will not get me again. And you are right: we are a minority. A recent poll in Brazil has shown that more than 90% of the population believes more in the existence of soul and after-death than in science. I am frequently invited because I am the president of the Brazilian Society of Skeptics and Rationalists, with 282 members, and a very active discussion list ]. It' fun! User:Rsabbatini 2 July 2005 22:02 (UTC)
 * Hi again. You're right, and what intregues me the most is how a country that is 90% Christian, about 82% Catholic has such a firm collective belief in the existence of ghosts, curses and similars.  It's point to syncretism...  I checked out the website you indicated, had no idea that it existed.  Quite interesting.  About the program, when I saw the teaser for it, I thought that they were going to discuss the stuff that happened in the fire of Joelma, what went wrong, how unprepared the firefighters were, the difficulties to identify the victims, etc.  I did not imagine that they would ramble on about ghosts, haunted offices and mediunic activity (they may be running out of subjects, since ghosts appear to have become the number one topic for the monthly special of the program...).<br&gt;On a somewhat related topic (but not really), I've nominated Chagas disease to be featured.  If you have some time, check out the comments page.  It's not always fun, people sometimes object an article for some...exaggerated reasons.  As the main contributor to that article, your contribution would be priceless to get the article featured.  Regards, Redux 3 July 2005 03:47 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the nomination, I agree, that would be my first featured article (there is another one I like very much, which is Adverse effect (medicine)). I've tried to improve on the Chagas disease article, please check on the results and tell me whether we have accomplished what the other users desired. Bom domingo! User:Rsabbatini
 * Hi again. The nomination seems to be going well.  Apparently, the main objection still standing refers to an alleged need to improve the English language in the article.  I see that efforts are already underway to get it resolved.  In my humble opinion, the language seemed fine from the beginning, but when it comes to featuring an article, there's always some little thing...  I shall see what I can do to expedite this process even more.  I'm quite satisfied that my early intervention seccured the support of MgM, who had at first abstained from casting a direct vote.  I'm really confident that we will get this one!  Once this is finished, we can see about the Adverse effect article you mentioned.  It's better to take one at a time, so we can focus our efforts on the immediate goal.  Até breve, Redux 7 July 2005 01:11 (UTC)

Cara,se você gosta tanto desse projeto,porque não entra na PT wiki?Você poderia ser uma boa adição...Igordebraga 7 July 2005 22:06 (UTC)(Pt:Usuário:Igordebraga)
 * Hi. It looks like the article has been featured!  The only footnote is that the discussion subpage hasn't been closed, so I'm trying to sort that out, but it looks like it's done!  It has even been added to WP:FA, the official listing. Now, if Sabbatini will indulge me, it looks like Igor posted in this subheader directed to me, so I would like to answer, even if Sabbatini's talk page would not be the suitable venue for me to address this.  I am already a member of the Pt wiki. I have, however, temporarily withdrawn because the admins, in a relatively small community of regular contributors, are making it rather difficult for others to contribute properly.  That is, of course, my humble opinion.  I have not left for good, I'm just taking a break, until it becomes workable over there again.  Redux 8 July 2005 01:58 (UTC)

Português
Cara,se você gosta tanto desse projeto,porque não entra na PT wiki?Você poderia ser uma boa adição...Igordebraga 7 July 2005 22:06 (UTC)(Pt:Usuário:Igordebraga)


 * Porque eu quero contribuir em inglês. O mundo sabe muito pouco sobre nós, justamente porque brasileiro não gosta de escrever em inglês. O que tem sobre o Brasil no Wikipedia English é vergonhoso de tão pouco, e português é uma lingua desconhecida. Tem bastante brasileiro para escrever no PT. E, quem quiser, pode traduzir meus artigos no EN. Abraços User:Rsabbatini

Image:Pinguim.jpeg

 * Please define copyright status of Image:Pinguim.jpg. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go to its page to provide the necessary information.

Image:Campinas01.jpg
thanks
 * Please check if copyright status of Image:Campinas01.jpg is free enough for wikipedia use. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go to its Image:Campinas01.jpg to provide the necessary information.

Image Tagging Image:Al-kindi.jpeg
Thanks for uploading Image:Al-kindi.jpeg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, contact Carnildo.

Image Tagging Image:Antonio_damasio.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Antonio_damasio.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, contact Carnildo.

Image:Hymenolepis.jpeg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hymenolepis.jpeg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you.

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Rsabbatini! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 17 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:


 * 1) Renato de Albuquerque -
 * 2) Gabriella Sabbatini -
 * 3) Alessandro Mancini -
 * 4) Laura Finocchiaro -
 * 5) Henrique Walter Pinotti -
 * 6) Renata Ceribelli -
 * 7) Cláudio Lembo -
 * 8) Ricardo Renzo Brentani -
 * 9) Renato Micallef -
 * 10) Renato Borghetti -

11. Renato Janine Ribeiro 12. Ernst W. Hamburger 13. Luiz Pinguelli Rosa 14. Marco Nanini 15. Ruy Hellmeister Novais 16. Hugo Sabatino 17. Fausto Corrêa da Silva