User talk:Rsabbatini/Archive 5

File permission problem with File:Michael Repacholi April 2021.png
Thanks for uploading File:Michael Repacholi April 2021.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:19, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian.

Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them;
 * How to edit a page
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

If you have any questions, see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. Angela 23:28, 2 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Walter Grey Walter
I've restored the content of Walter Grey Walter. Thanks for letting me know. I hope you can appreciate that the policy of removing the content is there to protect the rights of the copyright owners. If you're happy to release this under the GFDL and you are the original author, then we welcome your contribution. Thanks! Angela 02:08, 3 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Your contributions
I have moved your list of contributions on Wikipedia to your user page. My apologies for writing to your user page which is generally not done on Wikipedia. However, your article page is not the place for your list of Wikipedia contributions. It risks that page being seen as a Vanity page. Since you are the only author to that page you might do well to go through and question whether what is written there would be written by an encyclopedia writer from Brazil who may have met you once. You should read Auto-biography and go to the link Neutral point of view. I will not put the page up for deletion but others might. --CloudSurfer 18:31, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Psychopathology
I have noticed you have been doing some nice edits to the area covered by WikiProject Psychopathology. You may wish to join us there. This is a group of people who are either professionally involved in the area, students of psychology, or who have specific interests. We are attempting to fill the various gaps that exist on Wikipedia in this field. Have a look at the main page and then have a look at the sub-pages listed at the bottom. By the way, your recent entries on Shock therapy didn't really cover malarial fever treatment. These are the sort of things that should really be in an encyclopaedia as otherwise they will fall from memory and be lost. If you have enough information on these treatments they could really each have an article of their own.

You will note that I removed your home page as, not being directly related to the article, it would be seen as a spam link. Any reader finding your other link interesting would then be likely to surf to the homepage which achieves the same purpose. Also, I am just getting the hang of Cite sources as to how sources should be cited. I am afraid I didn't read this until recently and I have done a pile of refences in a numbered format. It does bring up the issue that web articles often do not have a date on their page. Wikipedia is the same but using the history tab one can determine when the last edit was made. You might want to consider dates for your projects. One thing I have used on web pages I have written is a line that states when the page was last edited with the date being updated automatically with each edit. Anyway, welcome and please join us. --CloudSurfer 18:34, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Stefan Zweig picture - copyright?
Hi, I very much like the photo you have added to Stefan Zweig. However, you have not indicated anything about the copyright status of this image - it would be great if you could give that information please. Thanks 138.37.188.109 10:45, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)

---

Hi, thanks for the inquiry. I took it from the official Stefan Zweig site. I send a message to the webmaster for authorization, and I am waiting for a response.

Hello
Hello. I think you're using far too many capital letters. Nearly every article listed on your user page has an "External Links" section (I've started changing these to "External links", with a lower-case "l") and other gratuitous capitals in section headings. See Manual of Style; on Wikipedia it's not conventional to capitalize an initial letter merely because it's in a section heading. Michael Hardy 02:20, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Capital letters in excess
Thanks, my friend. I will try to remember. Its a style coming from books and theses in Brazil.


 * It's also used in many books and magazines published in English, but Wikipedia, like any publisher, has a "house style", found at Manual of Style. Another thing: on Wikipedia one conventionally begins with a complete sentence, not a dictionary-style definition, and highlights the title word or title phrase at its first appearance, like this (see my recent edits to Fort Coligny). Michael Hardy 02:49, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Bradykinin
Hey Rsabbatini, very good work on bradykinin. I did not realise so much work on it had been done in Brazil. Could you elaborate on the role of des-9-arg-bradykinin? From the literature I'm not sure if it is active on all bradykinin receptor subtypes. It does seem that ACE-inhibitor-related angioedema is due to polymorphisms in bradykinin metabolism. JFW | T@lk  21:36, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I am really not an expert on bradykinin, but I will inquire some friends who have worked under Rocha e Silva. User:Rsabbatini

Images
When uploading images please always edit the image description page and do two things:
 * 1) State the source of the image (created yourself, the address of a web page or another source.)
 * 2) State the copyright. The easiest way to list the copyright is to use a copyright tag. The most important tags are &#x007B;&#x007B;GFDL&#x007D;&#x007D;, &#x007B;&#x007B;PD&#x007D;&#x007D;, and &#x007B;&#x007B;fairuse&#x007D;&#x007D;. GFDL is for images that you create yourself. PD is for public domain images (pre-1923 in most cases). Fair use is for copyrighted images that we can use under the fair use rules in the USA.

Without proper source and copyright information, images will eventually be deleted!

If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images (on my talk page) and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much.

In particular do you own the copyright to Image:Cotuca-unicamp.jpg? &mdash; Zeimusu | Talk 04:13, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Public domain Brazilian state government site http://www.unicamp.br. User:Rsabbatini

Diabetic nephropathy
My compliments on this page. I moved the page from Kimmelstiel-Wilson syndrome to its much more common name diabetic nephropathy. I must say I had never heard that there was an eponym for it! JFW | T@lk  02:22, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Thanks, my friend. I was thinking about this renaming, too, because it is how it is known now, but I confess I have a weakness for eponyms! :-)

BTW, I'm having a tremendous difficulty in finding the current name for two other eponymous diseases, Hodgson's (see Joseph Hodgson) and Pavy's (see Frederick William Pavy). Do you have any clue? User:Rsabbatini

Whonamedit, my eponym resource, is silent on Pavy and Hodgson. You have probably tried Google already. I suffer from similar eponymophilia. JFW | T@lk  19:36, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * I guess I will have to visit the old paper-based library! I enjoy WhoNamedIt, too, but, despite its size, it lacks the more obscure eponyms (and even a few common ones). Google, A9 and the new remarkable contextual search engine produced nothing of real value User:Rsabbatini

Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
Hello! This article appears to have been copied from, a web page of the institute. Their main page has a &copy; notice (see ), and I can't find any indication in the Brazilian Copyright law (Lei 9.610) that would state that general government publications were in the public domain. (Only treaties, conventions, laws, decrees, regulations, judicial decisions and other official enactments are; but general publications are not.) Can you justify the inclusion of this text almost verbatim in Wikipedia? For the time being, I have marked this as a suspected copyright infringement. Lupo 09:06, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Academia Brasileira de Ciências
Renato, I am really sorry to bug you again. But did you know that a straight-forward translation of a work without the permission of the author of the original work is also a violation of copyright? See chapter III, §29(IV) of Lei 9.610. This makes Academia Brasileira de Ciências a copyright infringement, too, unless you do have permission from ABC. If not, you'd have to rephrase and restructure a lot more. Although I don't speak Portuguese, I can read it well enough to see that the article is a very good, but direct translation of. (On a side note, the ABC site doesn't show any &copy; notice anywhere, but that is not necessary for the work to be copyrighted.) So, could you please rewrite that article? Or post some indication that you did have permission of ABC on the talk page? Lupo 09:07, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * Lupo, please be calm, what you are doing is spoiling completely my will to write to Wikipedia. I am in a drive to start an editorship on science and technology in Brazil. I don't know why on the earth you imagine that only the US government has public-domained its pages. I am in contact with the President of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences, a former teacher, colleague and good friend of mine, Eduardo Krieger, who is supporting me on this project and has become very interested in it, because it is ultra-important to the Brazilian scientific establishment to have knowledge about us well divulged. I have convinced him that Wikipedia would be a good medium for this because of its interlinking capabilities and popularity as a peer-reviewed medium. He is in the process of releasing thousands of pages from the Academy with bios on scientists, historical material, etc., written in English (although very badly) to me to reproduce in Wikipedia and which will form an incredibly rich material for us. You may have noted that I am not your run-of-the-mill hacker and nerd, for whom Wikipedia is just a hobby. I am a senior Brazilian scientist and university professor, and award-studded science writer, with excellent relationship with most of the current bosses of Brazilian science. They will not, I repeat, will not prosecute me or Wikipedia for the mere fact that we are publishing expertly written info on their beloved institutions and people. You are just too hard on this.

I had to capture and edit some pages prior to written consent, just to demonstrate to him what can be done, OK?? Please reinstate my Academia Brasileira de Ciências page, because it was in the process of being discussed with the board what a very nice thing it is, and now what you have done is just taint the page with the suspicion of wrongdoing, which I AM NOT DOING. Thanks. Prof.Dr. Renato M.E. Sabbatini, BA, PhD, etc., etc.

Lupo 12:13, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) I'm not trying to "spoil" anything. In fact, I recognize that you are doing good work, which is why I do contact you about these things in the first place. I don't normally do this. I'm trying to make sure that we don't have copyright infringements on Wikipedia.
 * 2) If you do have permission to use these texts under the GFDL, then state so. Academia Brasileira de Ciências gave the source, but it didn't indicate in any way that the copyright owner had agreed to release this translation under the GFDL, which allows anyone to modify the text in any way and to reuse it for whatever purposes, including commercial uses.
 * 3) I never said only the U.S. government placed its publications in the public domain. But I know that other governments don't do this. And the Brazialian copyright law doesn't say so for the Brazilian government. Can you provide a source for your claim that the Brazilian government does release all its publications (or at least those on the Web) into the public domain? That would be really helpful.
 * 4) I wasn't exactly suspecting wrongdoing. I rather had the feeling that maybe you just weren't aware of these copyright issues.
 * 5) No need to throw your degrees and scientist status at me. To quote your own words, "You may have noted that I am not your run-of-the-mill hacker and nerd." I'm not impressed; I hold a few degrees including a PhD myself. I am impressed by your generally good contributions.


 * (P.S.: if you can demonstrate permission, it might be a good idea to put a brief note like "This article is based on [URL] . Used with permission, see Talk:Academia Brasileira de Ciências." on talk pages of future articles you copy/translate from external sources to help avoid any misunderstandings. Lupo)


 * (P.P.S.: for demonstration purposes, you are surely aware that the text is still available in the page history? Lupo)

Bernardo Houssay Image
Hi! Whilst tagging images for the untagged images project I came accross the image of Bernardo Houssay that you added on Dec 30, 2004. This image appears to come from the Nobel Foundation website&mdash;the copyright page on this website states that permission is needed to reproduce the photographs of Nobel Laureates. Please can you supply information as to whether permission was granted for the use of this photograph on wikipedia? thanks, JeremyA 15:14, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Image source
Thank you for uploading Image:Anchieta.jpg. Please leave a note on that page about the source of the image because of copyright law. Thank you. --Ellmist 03:10, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Also, Image:Berger2.jpg. --Ellmist 19:10, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * Status has been made clear on both. User:Rsabbatini

Cesar Lattes
Dear Sir, thank you for your contributions. I have a question about the copyright status of Image:Cesar Lattes.jpeg: The notice says Public domain State University of Campinas, but the online source claims © 1994-2004 Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Could you as a former director of one center of the University direct me to a page or link that states the source as public domain? Otherwise we could list the image as fairuse, that would be no problem at all. My apologies for the hassle, I am just trying to clarify things. And again thank you for your many contributions. Best wishes, -- Chris 73 Talk 04:07, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC) >Hi, Chris, it is fair use, generated by the Press Office of my university. The photographer belongs to the U. staff (Toninho, I know him personally). But if necessary I can ask for their permission. --R.Sabbatini 17:56, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright tags
Thanks for uploading Image:Covian.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GFDL, or  if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, Tagishsimon (talk) 18:30, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * Status has been made clear. User:Rsabbatini

Image copyright
Thank you for uploading Image:Brain-cysticercosis.jpeg and for stating the source. However, its copyright status is unclear, so it may have to be deleted. If it is open content or public domain, please give proof of this on the image page. If the image is fair use, please provide a rationale. Thank you. --Ellmist 04:50, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Image source
Thank you for uploading Image:Bradykin.gif. Its copyright status is unclear, so it may have to be deleted. Please leave a note on the image page about the source of the image. Thank you. --Ellmist 04:48, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Also, Image:Brown dermatome.jpg. --Ellmist 06:19, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Stereo 820d.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stereo 820d.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p 13:04, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Fixed: old public domain

Image Tagging Image:Raymond_dart.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Raymond_dart.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p 17:50, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't know, will temporarily fix it up as fair-use.

Meduna.gif
Thanks for uploading Meduna.gif. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you created it and wish to release it under the GFDL, or  if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, Laura Scudder | Talk 22:34, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Fixed with fair use. User:Rsabbatini

Concern regarding Draft:Eµ-Pim1 mouse
Hello, Rsabbatini. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eµ-Pim1 mouse, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sociedade Brasileira para o Progresso da Ciência (logo).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sociedade Brasileira para o Progresso da Ciência (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Image source problem with File:Sports-dress-codes.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Sports-dress-codes.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:28, 25 March 2022 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 04:28, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Samuel Thomas von Soemmering.jpeg


The file File:Samuel Thomas von Soemmering.jpeg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Superseded by c:File:Samuel Thomas von Soemmering.jpg"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 11:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Eµ-Pim1 mouse


Hello, Rsabbatini. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eµ-Pim1 mouse".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of FP Top 100 Global Thinkers


The article FP Top 100 Global Thinkers has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Essentially a promo linking page to the winners lists with primary references. No indication if its notable, no secondary sources to indicate it is notable. The guardian source just lists the names as well, without analysis. Half the page is not referenced and there has been a notability tag on since 2018 and not been updated. Fails WP:NLIST."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  scope_creep Talk  10:48, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Calvaert-the-presentatiion-of-mary.jpg


The file File:Calvaert-the-presentatiion-of-mary.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, superseded by File:Denys Calvaert - The Presentation of Mary - WGA03790.jpg."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 10:57, 21 January 2023 (UTC)