User talk:Rsaghatchi/sandbox

Article evaluation: Plagiarism

 * Everything in this article was relevant to the topic, there wasn't anything that really distracted me.
 * This article is very neutral, it is mostly just stating facts so it doesn't seem to be swaying towards a certain side.
 * There really aren't any present viewpoints that try to pick sides. This article is mostly facts, therefore the viewpoints are pretty transparent.
 * The sources of this article work, they send me to other Wikipedia articles, along with the original source such as the New York Times. For this article the sources support the claim, which would be what plagiarism is.
 * Each fact in this article is referenced with appropriate and factual references. These sources are neutral, they do not try to sway the opinion of the reader, they simply try to inform them.
 * All the information on this page is relevant especially for an article on such a topic. Learning about plagiarism is relevant considering the definition hasn't changed.
 * On the talk page discussions such as what is plagiarism, and if you can self plagiarize are being debated on. This helps the source as it is helping the readers continue to learn about plagiarism.
 * This article is rated B, Mid-Importance. This article is apart of the wikiproject Philosophy.
 * Wikipedia describes plagiarism the same way we discussed it in class. In class we learned that we need to cite ideas that aren't ours and Wikipedia preaches the same ideology.

Source

Rsaghatchi (talk) 19:38, 9 January 2018 (UTC)