User talk:Rsanchezsaez

Hi and welcome to Wikipedia.

Thankyou for finding the time to sign up and contribute to our little project. If you're in doubt about anything, you might want to check out the Help centre, the FAQs, or the Manual of Style; otherwise, don't hesitate to ask questions at my talk page, or at the Village Pump.

The most important thing to remember is to be bold when editing and creating pages!

It's also a good idea to sign the New user log and add a little about yourself.

When contributing to a talk page, it is a good idea to sign your name by typing four tildes after your comments, like this: ~. This will autmatically add your username and a timestamp. Please do not add this signature to encyclopedia articles you may edit, even if you have created them. Wikipedia articles are owned by the community, not by any one person.

Above all, have fun!

TPK 11:37, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)

<!--

NAMBLA
As I saw that you edited Roman Catholic Church sex abuse scandal I would like to invite you to help with conflicts in the article about the "North American Man/Boy love organization" as well. Get-back-world-respect 20:23, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * Hello, as you can see, my addition to the RCCsas article was very minor, and I do not think I have enough knowledge on the NAMBLA to edit its article, specially if it is a conflictive one. Sorry about that. --rsanchezsaez 21:42, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Taken from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Get-back-world-respect&oldid=6758245

NAMBLA, Masturbation and Roman Catholic Church sex abuse scandal

Hello,

I did not a saw a strong correlation between Roman Catholic Church sex abuse scandal and NAMBLA for you to urge me, and probably others, to participate in the edit wars of the NAMBLA's article. But I am positively sure that there is none of this relationship between NAMBLA and masturbation.

I think that messaging users, like user:Doug22123 that mildly is against masturbation and who has trouble mantaining a NPOV in the aforementioned article, to help you with the NAMBLA issue is not a correct Wikipedia behavior, specially after you complain about how people "splits up entries and bans unwanted topics into special entries that will hardly ever be read".

You have all the right in the world to be against NAMBLA and against pedophiles, but Wikipedia is about facts rather that about personal and non-neutral points of views, and because of that we can not remove information aknowledging that such organizations and such people do exist. I think masturbation is healthy, and I would recommend to everybody doing it daily, but you don't see me writing that in the masturbation article.

Don't take this personally, I just wanted to point what I think is a Wikipedia wrongdoing, that is, trying to recruit people whith your same ideology, for helping you with an article from unrelated ones.

By the way, I think that your contributions to the WMD articles are great, keep that kind of great work up. --rsanchezsaez 20:35, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I do not think that you need much knowledge for trying to help resolve conflicts. Any reasonable user can help resolving conflicts, which are most often not based on disputed facts but on opinions and neutral presentations. I am not "against" pedophiles. I am just worried about tendencies to downplay the harm of child sexual abuse, and I hoped that someone who feels comfortable with editing articles like masturbation or Roman Catholic Church sex abuse scandal might be comfortable with helping out with another touchy article related to sexuality as well. This is not "recruiting" of people I regard as potential supporters of my opinions. I did not even look closely at your edits. I just see many controversial articles dominated by very few editors, which is not good for neutrality and makes it difficult to get a picture of what would be the consensus in a community of neutral editors. Sorry if this disturbed you. Get-back-world-respect 20:46, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * No offense taken, it was just a constructive critic.


 * I agree that controversial articles should be reviewed by more people than currently do it, but I also think that many people editing this kind of articles (I am not refering to you), do not take NPOV seriously, and in my opinion that is the most important thing to have in mind when editing Wikipedia. --rsanchezsaez 21:33, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * I fully agree. The more people we have editing every single article, the higher the chance that some are among them who do care about neutrality. Get-back-world-respect 23:54, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)

-->

<!--

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)


 * The CC-by-nc-sa license is not compatible with CC-by-sa because it restricts the CC-by-sa one step farther. Because of this, WikiTravel cannot use CC-by-nc-sa, for instance, if it wanted to sell a tourbook, even for a small price.  It is unclear whether the compatibility works in the other direction, and since I am not a lawyer I can't answer that (for instance, can a CC-by-sa document be used in a CC-by-nc-sa document).  My guess is that you can't because it would restrict the original author's work more than they desired, but I really am not sure.    – Ram-Man (comment) (talk)   20:51, Dec 13, 2004 (UTC)

-->

Save the List!
They are trying to delete the lists we've work so hard on help put a stop to it. List of J-pop Artists Vote to keep our precious list!!! -Bilaber 21:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

If possible, and if you remember...
Could you update Image:Ashley and callo by akihiko yoshida.jpg with the source of the image?(where you got it, not who made it) Thanks. Cheers, Lankybugger ○ Yell ○ 13:29, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Visual Kei
There is a call for comments at the Visual kei article, I see you have worked on the article before, and wondered if you would like to participate in the discussion. Denaar 05:09, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Crustation
I have nominated Crustation, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Crustation. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:48, 9 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi. I noticed you deleted my Crustation article for lack of notability. While I acknowledge it is a not very known band and my article was pretty weak (for example, the red links to the band members should be removed), the album has acquired cult status among trip-hop fans, and I think it should be relisted.


 * It is listed on the French and German Wikipedias.
 * And here's the Amazon page of the album . Notice how there are some reviews about the album, so it was certainly sold commercially. Also notice that the album is out of the stock and somebody is trying to sell it for $74.


 * Right now I don't have much free time, but if this doesn't yet meet WP:MUSIC or WP:N tell me and I'll try to find more reliable sources when I have time. Please answer on my talk page. Thanks! --rsanchezsaz 15:21, 15 July 2008 (UTC)


 * My view is that you need more than the Amazon link. I suggest that you need to find a decent review in a significant music publication. When you have added what you think are sufficient sources then the way to go is to take it to WP:DRV with a request to recreate. TerriersFan (talk) 19:11, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Ashley and callo by akihiko yoshida.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:Ashley and callo by akihiko yoshida.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 15:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Rsanchezsaez! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Akihiko Yoshida -
 * 2) Nacho Canut -

Nomination of Alaska! for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alaska! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alaska! until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:12, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Everything Is Made in China


A tag has been placed on Everything Is Made in China requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Everymorning  talk to me  22:34, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)