User talk:Rsc src

May 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Royal Society of Canada, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Royal Society of Canada was changed by Rsc src (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950839 on 2012-05-01T19:11:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Royal Society of Canada, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Royal Society of Canada was changed by Rsc src (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852821 on 2012-06-05T16:42:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:42, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Potential copyright problem
Your addition to Royal Society of Canada has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. SchreyP (messages) 19:09, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Rsc src, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited was Royal Society of Canada, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. It is also worth noting that Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which specifically link them to one company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! You can also just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! SchreyP (messages) 19:19, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Royal Society of Canada, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=496452521 here]. Mdann52 (talk) 15:24, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for a number of reasons. Some of your editing has been distinctly disruptive, such as repeatedly removing all content from an article, leaving it totally blank, which on the face of it looks like vandalism. At times you have given misleading edit summaries for edits that did things very different from what the edit summaries said. Some of your editing has been unmistakably promotional in character, which is contrary to Wikipedia policy. You have made no response to messages, and in particular have shown no sign of taking note of the message concerning the conflict of interest guideline. Finally, it is evident, both from your editing and from the account's username, that this account is being used to represent an organisation, which is against Wikipedia policy. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. If you do request an unblock, you should describe what editing you expect to do, and that editing should not be promotional, nor should it be such as to give concern about your likely conflict of interest. You should also indicate a new username that you are willing to change to, which should be for you alone, not to be shared, and not representing an organisation.

instead.
 * You have not addressed the issues raised in the block notice. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I will delay my decline of this request in the hope that you will rethink your position. It is difficult to edit objectively those subjects to which one has a close relationship.  That is the basis for Wikipedia's guideline WP:Conflict of interest.  This guideline is relevant as your unblock request demonstrates that you are here to "correct" an article covering your employer.  It would advance your chances for unblock if you could offer some commitment to avoid editing in the area of your COI.  Tide  rolls  21:33, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Royal Society of Canada
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Royal Society of Canada, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.rsc.ca/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Royal Society of Canada and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Royal Society of Canada, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Royal Society of Canada with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Royal Society of Canada. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Royal Society of Canada saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! CharlieEchoTango ( contact ) 05:57, 13 June 2012 (UTC)