User talk:Rschen7754/Archive 9

Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:27, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

MfD Archive
I noticed you recently archived a debate at MfD, for future reference we usually move them to the bottom of the page on MFD until an entire day is done and then archive. Thanks for closing though.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 22:06, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

A660 road
What makes you, or your bot, classify this as a stub? It's got a lot of content, infobox, ext links, photos... ? PamD (talk) 08:13, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Same question about A65 road - it's a different kind of article from the above, but also seems to me to be at least a "Start". What are your criteria? PamD (talk) 08:16, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The article can be any length, but it has to follow WP:UKRD. --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:20, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Ca browse/Interstate
A tag has been placed on Template:Ca browse/Interstate requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Ca browse/State Route
A tag has been placed on Template:Ca browse/State Route requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Ca browse/U.S. Route
A tag has been placed on Template:Ca browse/U.S. Route requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Ca browse/browse no route
A tag has been placed on Template:Ca browse/browse no route requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Ca browse/browse route
A tag has been placed on Template:Ca browse/browse route requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

SR 91 extension
You know anything about SR 91 west extension. I dont know clearly the problems about doing it, all I hear is it is going from I-110 to SR-1. I dont know the issues. The only battle I'm clear with is the 710, 241, and 57 South extensions.-- Freewayguy ( Webmail ) 19:20, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Edit summaries
Thanks for the warning. I'll be sure to be more subtle in my humor from now on. --  K é iryn talk 03:02, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

My RFA
My RFA was successful with a final result of 61/0/3. Thanks for the co-nom! See you when you get back from Costa Rica! —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 17:17, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

:)


 ComputerGuy890100TalkPolls has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Have a nice day, Rschen7754!  ComputerGuy890100TalkPolls 00:59, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 23:42, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Citations in the lead of an article
I've opened a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads —  master son T - C 23:05, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Concurrency color coding and Termini in Junction Lists
I've opened a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_U.S._Roads  —  master son T - C 23:54, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter - Issue 3

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – It's all here. —О бот  (т • ц) 21:37, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

California State Route 20 on hold
Shouldn't be too much. Whenever you get to it! &mdash; Rob (  talk  ) 02:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Artisol2345's sockpuppet
Are you sure Yorkabe is Artisol's second account. Yorkabe even put on her user page is Artisol sister's account. Alot of people has siblings, and Yorkabe and Artisol seems like two different people. Did you check their e-mail address and make sure they are not the same? If they are not the same means they are two different person. And also good idea if they dont post message on each others talk page. I dont see Artisol posting message on Yorkabes talk page. -- Freewayguy ( Webmail ) 17:50, 24 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Did you block any of Artisol2345's sockpuppet or somebody else did?-- Freewayguy ( Webmail ) 17:35, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't remember. I think I did. --Rschen7754 (T C) 17:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I thouhgt Yorkabes is Artisol's sister; and AL2TB is his cousin. Thats what they said on their user page. Did you check their e-mail?-- Freewayguy ( Webmail ) 17:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Um, just because he / they say it doesn't mean it's true. --Rschen7754 (T C) 17:50, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * How do you know then?What happens if it is true?Because most people have at least one brothers or sisters, and sometimes moms and dads work on Wiki too-- Freewayguy ( Webmail ) 19:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * This is the worst excuse in the book - it's like saying "my dog ate my homework". --Rschen7754 (T C) 19:16, 27 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Then how to figure out people has been suspect as sockpuppet. It is tough to check because sometimes the names is different. Dont I check the user contribs?-- Freewayguy ( Webmail ) 23:35, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It is difficult to understand what you are saying. --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:42, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I meant how you know people cheat by sockpuppeting what's the other common evidence besides similar user names.-- Freewayguy ( Webmail ) 00:02, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Similar methods of editing. --Rschen7754 (T C) 00:12, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * To know people's sockpuppet don't we need to check their IP to find their home adr, or just looking at their midification methods. Actually what is "similar method of changing" it is difficult to indentify the way people modifies.-- Freewayguy ( talk ) 23:53, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:07, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Redirect change?
I founded WikiProject M*A*S*H, and I would like to suggest a change of redirects: WP:MASH goes to the Massachusetts Road Project. Since MASH is closer to M*A*S*H (and the film is named MASH), than it is to Massachusetts Road Project, could we arrange a changing of the redirect? Basketball <font family= "Calibri" size="2" color="#FFA500">110 (talk) 18:12, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Considering that your project is a newly founded project, I don't believe that this would be a good move as of yet. If this project becomes fully established, I would consider this (as this would destroy the **SH shortcut consistency that we have at WP:USRD). --Rschen7754 (T C) 17:24, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Los Alamitos Curve 405,605,22.png needs to be deleted
Since this article, Los Alamitos Curve has been deleted. This image needs to be deleted as well because no one uses it anyway. --75.47.216.56 (talk) 22:51, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No, it doesn't. --Rschen7754 (T C) 22:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Why? --75.47.216.56 (talk) 23:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I ask you - why does it need to be deleted? --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:06, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Mirrors and faux copies
Hey there.

A little known trick: there is a page where you can add exclusion rules when you find a mirror. :-) I add to it with some frequency when I spot one, but it looks like for-profit Wikipedia vampires are about a dime a dozen lately.  &mdash; Coren (talk) 23:47, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the information. --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

U.S. Route 50 in California
Any remaining issues were addressed and the article was passed. Good work.User:calbear22 (talk) 17:58, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

K-58 (Kansas highway)
You deleted this as "A1: Not enough context to identify subject", but the Google cache shows this to be untrue. --NE2 16:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Feel free to recreate it then. --Rschen7754 (T C) 22:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Why, so you can delete it again? --NE2 04:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * If you write more than what you did, it won't be deleted. --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The point is that you shouldn't have deleted it in the first place, since it definitely had "enough context to identify subject". --NE2 05:21, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Reading the definition of A1 - it says "Very short articles providing little or no context". --Rschen7754 (T C) 05:24, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * This provided sufficient context - it's a state highway in Kansas. No context is when you don't say what the subject even is. --NE2 06:26, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * What's your beef about this? Just recreate the darn thing and write two sentences about it and then it'll all be fine. --Rschen7754 (T C) 06:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * My beef is that you deleted a useful article (it was useful because of the disambiguation at least). If it's so easy to write two sentences, why didn't you? --NE2 06:50, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * It may eventually be useful, but then it was cruddy. --Rschen7754 (T C) 07:01, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Uh, it was useful. When it existed, someone looking for the former K-58 could find it. --NE2 07:43, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * If you really have an issue with it, take it to DRV. --Rschen7754 (T C) 00:37, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:56, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

US 12 pics
If you can't find yours, or you think they're too low quality, I might be able to take some of the route west of Yakima next weekend (i.e. a week from tomorrow). However, Lewiston is a bit far for me, and I'd probably prefer not making the trip altogether. :-P Plus, mine probably wouldn't be all that higher quality.

Basically, I'm just making promises I don't intend to keep. :-P --  K é iryn talk 21:05, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

IP Complaint
Umm, I just sort of accidently found this and thought you should know. Not that it's that much of a threat but just so you know... ~ Bella   Swan  23:45, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/Highways 2
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. No formal enforcement measures are being proposed at this time, in light of the hope that editors will act of their own volition and take with them a more in-depth understanding of the issues, principles, and the disputes themselves, for future benefit and to avoid the need for more formal responses; in particular, all members of WikiProject U.S. Roads are advised that when asserting the existence of a prior consensus, it is necessary to refer to prior discussions or debates on Wikipedia where that consensus has been established.

&mdash; Coren (talk) for the Arbitration Committee, 03:07, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Ree Woo
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Ree Woo, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Ree Woo seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Ree Woo, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:01, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Ummm... I nominated Ree Woo for AfD, although I should have taken it to DRV instead. You can't just undelete articles like that.  The version that was deleted definitely met A1, seeing as how it didn't mention where the character was from, or even that it was a fictional character (hence the editor's confusion when he originally tagged as A7 for real people).
 * The Kansas highway that you deleted under A1 did have context however, since it included the fact that it was a state highway, which is apparently sufficient for a claim of notability. --  K é iryn talk 07:23, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Recent rangeblock
User talk:75.47.230.13 seems to be caught up in the rangeblock you recently applied on 75.47.0.0/16 - not knowing the situation, I wanted to let you know so you could review the unblock request. Thanks. <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Hers <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold">fold  (t/a/c) 03:49, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Aagh. Requests for comment/75.47.x.x is the main reason, plus trying to steal my password, vandalism, and something else... I'm not really sure what to do in this situation, but let me know before action is taken. Thanks, Rschen7754 (T C) 06:26, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, and legal threats, and trying to close their own RFC. --Rschen7754 (T C) 06:27, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.
Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 09:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:29, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter, Issue 4
Apologies for the late delivery; my internet connection went down halfway through the delivery process.


 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – It's all here. —Rschen7754bot (talk) 22:51, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Rangeblock unblock request
Hello, would you mind taking a look at this unblock request? The IP is being affected by the rangeblock you applied to 75.47.0.0/16 here. Thanks. <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Hers <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold">fold  (t/a/c) 23:53, 7 May 2008 (UTC)—

Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:33, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Deletions
I know you don't care, but I just wanted to re-vist a page i had read, that you have deemed not notable for wikipedia, and deleted. please could you think about what is actually gained by deleting "borderline" articles. It is frustrating and is putting off people from contributing. Chendy (talk) 19:01, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I can't even help you if you don't tell me what page you're talking about. --Rschen7754 (T C) 22:51, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for response - the page is Bitstream_(Electronic_Musician). Chendy (talk) 21:55, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * This article gives no evidence of notability of the music group. See WP:BAND for more info. --Rschen7754 (T C) 22:09, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

RE: Washington stubs
Creating the stubs are part of my "Washington Improvement Plan". Here are the steps: 1. Create all articles about current routes. 2. Create all articles about proposed routes. 3. Create all articles about former routes. 4. Create all articles about PSH and SSH routes. 5. Improve all articles about current routes, starting with the Interstates and U.S. routes. 6. Improve all articles about proposed and former (including PSH and SSH) routes. 7. Keep on improving afterwards. — ComputerGuy890100  Talk to meWhat I've done to help Wikipedia 16:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Stop erasing I-390 data
Yourself and Scott5114 need to stop. That info people put on there that I rewrote is true. Please stop!

--Check77 (talk) 01:06, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Uh, no. --Rschen7754 (T C) 01:08, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: NYSR participants list
Hello, I am currently working on Wyoming State Route articles, Erie County Routes/Niagara County Routes (New York) articles, in addition to fixing any errors that I may come across in New York State Route articles, and adding information if I can. Thanks for letting me know about the changes. Ngs61 (talk) 14:19, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: NYSR participants list
Is there any reason why my name was taken off and other users such as Polaron's name was left on the USRD participants list? DanTD (talk) 12:32, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Polaron is considered to be a USRD-wide editor due to his participation in numerous IRC and WT:USRD discussions. --Rschen7754 (T C) 17:21, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

USRD participants list
As discussed at WT:USRD, the participants list at WP:USRD is being split by state. Due to any of the following factors- your extended participation in WT:USRD discussions, your IRC participation, or your extended participation in Shields or Maps, I have guessed that you are a nationwide editor and have designated you as such in the USRD partiicpants table. This is part of the lengthy process. If this is in error, please let me know immediately. This is especially likely with this group as I have to guess whether you are a national or a state editor. Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 21:54, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Rush Street FAC
Please keep an open mind to the new plethora of images. Please reconsider your opinion.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 22:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Please come reassess the images.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 07:42, 21 May 2008 (UTC)--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 07:42, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:26, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:47, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Artisol2345 IP's personal attack
Can you take a look at this; see how he delete my message from my talk page, he's doing personal attack. Thank you for noticing he delete my message from my Welcome talk page, also he put false blocking on my talk page.-- Freewayguy  Discussions Show all changes 03:07, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * is responsible for blanking the above message, as well as an obscene edit summary while blanking another IP's talk page. I thought we solved the 75 IP problem? -- Kéiryn (talk) 19:35, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Not that it matters much, but sorry about my incorrect edit summary on the previous message. It was supposed to just say "more". -- Kéiryn (talk) 19:41, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * and don't be a fanatic because you think i'm a sockpuppet of  doesn't mean that i'm  the one who used that and besides that's not mine anyway and  knew that his cousin is doing something wrong. --75.47.133.244 (talk) 20:28, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Guys stop false accusing me, leave me alone and don't be a dick. --75.47.133.244 (talk) 20:47, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I never accused you of being a sockpuppet. I was still retired when Aristol2345 and AL2TB were here, so I have no idea what that's about.  I'm just saying that edit summaries like this are inappropriate.  And so is going around blanking stuff on other people's user talk pages.  So yeah, no false accusations coming from me. -- Kéiryn (talk) 22:25, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, i know that i used a edit summaries like this inappropriate for a reason because i hate that user giving me a bad time with a level 4im warning because i edit someone else's comments on freeway / toll road talk page articles such as Talk:Golden State Freeway, Talk:California State Route 261, Talk:Interstate 10 in California and Talk:Interstate 5 in California for a fix or a remove. --75.47.218.8 (talk) 00:40, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Guys! Stop! Argue on your own talkpage, not Rschen7754's or mine. This is Rschen7754's talkpage-not yours.-- Freewayguy  Discussions Show all changes 04:34, 14 June 2008 (UTC)


 * You should take a look, they have harass me on my talkpage 3 month ago, and don't listen to them, they only lying. I believe you people can lie on thier talkpage. If they keep harassing me like this don't be afraid to block them.

Please continue this conversation somewhere else; I have enough to do besides trying to mediate between you two. --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:42, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 9, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:35, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

I-710 north extension in Pasadena
Do you think they will ever extend the I-710. I thought its unlikely, since it strongly upsets the city in many ways. To me I don't think so even if our economy is strong.-- Freewayguy  Discussions Show all changes 01:06, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't know. --Rschen7754 (T C) 01:10, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

you ever hear anything about it? I thought you like in South California.-- Freewayguy  Discussions Show all changes 01:18, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Well of course. If you type it into Google I'm sure you can find something about it. --Rschen7754 (T C) 01:27, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter
The newsletter's deadline has passed and we have some sections missing. Do you mind doing them becuase I am leaving until July, so I don't have time. — ComputerGuy890100  Talk to meWhat I've done to help Wikipedia 23:38, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Uh, I'm leaving until September... --Rschen7754 (T C) 21:33, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Louisiana Highway 415
Thank you for pointing out that particular road policy. I was not aware of it. After reading the road policies you cited, I also noticed th second sentence at the top of the policy which says "These standards are not set in stone, however, and can be ignored if the particular highway warrants it." Sf46 (talk) 09:27, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
 * But that particular highway does not warrant it. What makes LA-415 so special? --Rschen7754 (T C) 09:28, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Revert?
Why do you enjoy reverting my revisions? That's practically all you're doing, and you're the only one doing it. Dabby (talk) 22:02, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't enjoy reverting you; it's a pain and more work for me to do. I do it because you're doing things wrong that need to be fixed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 22:10, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I would appreciate it if you not revert all my edits. Most - if not all - of my edits are legit. Dabby (talk) 15:39, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

New Mexico
Scott told me New Mexico DOT is worse than Oklahoma, isn't New Mexico DOT honestly that bad. Scott said once he almost got lost in northeast New Mexico by lacking blue arrows pointing N,S,W,and E. But most signs I saw on interstate-guide like I-10 points to n,s,w,e. What Scott meant by New Mexico has poor signage. Is this true some other "Trans, DOT is even dangerous?-- Freewayguy  Msg USC 03:28, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 23 and 26, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:14, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 30, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

California State Route 37
I was looking at the A class review for it, and you had mentioned that ref 6 had been deleted from the newspaper's website, I found it in the Internet Archive. See my comment at WikiProject U.S. Roads/Assessment/A-Class review/California State Route 37. -- Admrb♉ltz (t • c • [ log]) 04:39, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Unfortunately, I can't do anything about it... --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:59, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Updated it. Not the prettiest reference, but I left the cite web part alone and added the Internet Archive note after it. -- Admrb♉ltz (t • c • [ log]) 05:07, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Possibly Artisol2345?
and 75.47 are going at it. The former has obviously been here before, but that's of course not a reason to do anything if he's acting in good faith and not making bad edits. --NE2 11:35, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Splat5572 is linked to of one of his IP address. --75.47.194.16 (talk) 11:44, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 7, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:25, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Washington State Route 531
Washington State Route 531 has recently passed its GA and is up for A-Class review. According to the article history of the article, you are a contributor to this article. Please leave comments at this link. --CG was here. (T - C - S - E) 17:11, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Suspected sock puppets/Artisol2345 (2nd)
It might be that Artisol is the 75 IP. Your input is requested. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 05:53, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Do not revert my edits in California State Route 107; my revisions are correct (check the Caltrans logs) --Splat5572 (talk) 18:19, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 14 and 21, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:13, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter, Issue 5
Apologies for the late delivery; here is the June edition of the newsletter.


 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – It's all here. —Rschen7754bot (talk) 20:29, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

WP:USRD newsletter
FYI - I signed up for the notification only, and received both the subst version as well as the notification. -- Admrb♉ltz (t • c • [ log]) 22:47, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * You're on the subst list... --Rschen7754 (T C) 22:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hrm, woops. Removing subst. Thanks! -- Admrb♉ltz (t • c • [ log]) 22:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Splat5572
Hello,. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --NE2 01:39, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * While there was due cause for concern, that probably shouldn't have been sent to ANI right off the bat. Just a note for the future. Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 02:03, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

I also requested Requests for arbitration --Splat5572 (talk) 23:32, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello Rchen7754, I'm glad you are back. The problem with is he keeps putting Santa Ana, Golden State, Ventura, and Hollywood Freeways back to exit list when we already have a exit list on those smaller articles. Those segments should not be mentioned on I-5 and US 101 exit list becasue its duplicate, repetitive and does no usage. I'm tire of fighting and I was blocked for 24 hours for 3RR. The wars Splat5572 made is shown on the contributions. After Splat5572's blcok for 24 hours at least 3 reverts keeps going. He's obviosly not yielding.-- Freewayguy Call? Fish 18:37, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * That is not an excuse to make personal attacks. --Rschen7754 (T C) 18:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Then what should I do now. Splat5572 obviously won't yield. Do you agree with me, Santa Ana and Golden State Freeway exit lists should be left out from I-5, becasue the list is shown on their own articles.-- Freewayguy Call? Fish 19:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * WP:DR. --Rschen7754 (T C) 19:17, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Help me. is wearing my patience.-- Freewayguy  Call? Fish 22:37, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Song
Hallo, I am from the german Wikipedia from the sociologic section, and I found out that you wrote a song text on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Song. We want to know the reason(s) why you wrote this song. It would be kind of you to leave an english (or german) comment on http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedistik/Soziologie/Musik&action=edit&redlink=1. Thank you --84.166.123.219 (talk) 07:34, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 28, August 9, 11 and 18, 2008.
Sorry I haven't been sending this over the past few weeks. Ralbot (talk) 05:49, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:49, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

For when you get back
I blocked the 75 IP for 2 months due to removing someone's comment with the edit summary "Fuck you!", but he seems to have returned as.

Oh, and don't forget to update your mob-rule. Not counting what you got in Arkansas, you picked up at least McDonald, Newton, Jasper, Lawrence, and Greene. (I did that from memory! :P) —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 11:03, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 25 and September 8, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:15, 10 September 2008 (UTC)