User talk:Rsjaffe/Archives/2021/May

File source problem with File:Listedpso.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Listedpso.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate
Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter. Feel free to participate in the journal.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:
 * Publish an article to the journal.
 * Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
 * Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
 * Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
 * Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
 * Join the editorial board.
 * Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
 * Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
 * Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
 * Ceština, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, 한국어, Português, Slovenšcina, Suomi, Svenska, Ελληνικά, Русский, العربية, 日本語
 * Technical work like template designing for the journal.
 * Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to . If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at.
 * Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

 D ip ta ns hu Talk 14:51, 11 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.

Draft:Fannie Quigley concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Fannie Quigley, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Potential Bot Issue
I noticed on your bot run of Citation bot that it removed the "format=PDF" text from several sources. Not sure why it did this, but just letting you know. -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 20:58 on March 26, 2020 (UTC)

AWB
Hi! You seem to have been here a good deal longer than me, so I'm sure you're aware that AWB users are not supposed to make "insignificant or inconsequential edits". Specifically, "An edit that has no noticeable effect on the rendered page is generally considered an insignificant edit". What change perceptible to the reader did you make with this edit? – I'm not managing to see any (and so have reverted it). I'm sure you wish only to improve the encyclopaedia, but please be aware that repeatedly making pointless edits like this one has in some cases led to several fairly major community sanctions, among them at least one permanent siteban from the project. As long as you are doing something that makes a useful and visible change to the page you should be all right, but stuff like bypassing a maintenance template redirect such as "refimprove" is not actually helpful or useful – the redirect works fine, replacing it with something else just creates unnecessary background noise which at least one editor (me!) finds faintly annoying. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:49, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Is a revert of a pointless edit also pointless? — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 12:42, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Are you talking about Yorkshire? There were visible edits there, but I see that SD, which AWB suggested moving, got moved back by you. I believe I have the latest version of AWB. If I do, I'll contact the maintainer to fix that. --Rsjaffe (talk) 15:03, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, being too brief. I visited here to post (below) about AWB and saw the above comment. I did wonder if the revert by Justlettersandnumbers was itself a Good Thing — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 18:22, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

AWB++
Please update your AWB or turn off genfixes — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 12:42, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The bug was reported earlier this month and they're in the process of fixing it. I'll avoid that until it's fixed. Thanks for the heads-up. --Rsjaffe (talk) 15:16, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Łódź - a typo introduced as a typo fix
Hi, in Special:diff/1024580812 you replaced 'the University of Łódź' with 'the university of Łódź' which is wrong - please see University of Łódź. --CiaPan (talk) 17:42, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads-up. Sorry for the mistake. --Rsjaffe (talk) 00:19, 25 May 2021 (UTC)