User talk:Rskellner/Archive 1

Request for help at pl wiki
Cześć (is in polish "Hi" :-),

my edit in article Laubach at pl wiki - is very small modyfication - i only add space bettwen the numer ("10.000" to: "10 000", in poland we divide the thousands for a space, not than USA, point - ".").

I would prefer not to undertake this thing. I am a only intermediate speaker of English. I have got a big troubles witch the understand Your message. So be better, when you request different user, who is a better speaker in English. See Lists of Wikipednians, who are a near-natve speaker of English. I recommend Roo72 or Lcamtuf.

Logolego Talk 16:52, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


 * It wasn't much difficult. I try create this: pl:Friedrich Kellner. It's only small stub. Raquest any other Wikipedian, to the expanding it.


 * I Wish you a nic WikiDay, Logolego [[Image:Flag of Poland corrected.svg|20px|I am polish.]]Talk 17:00, 15 January 2007 (UTC).


 * P.S.: Please excuse any grammatical errors on this message; I am only an intermediate speaker of English. Logolego [[Image:Flag of Poland corrected.svg|20px|I am polish.]]Talk 17:00, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


 * P.P.S: You have got the same message on your emial. Logolego [[Image:Flag of Poland corrected.svg|20px|I am polish.]]Talk 17:00, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't know if you are on line. In this situation i Wan't send you this email. :-) Logolego [[Image:Flag of Poland corrected.svg|20px|I am polish.]]Talk 17:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you so very much, Logolego. I have just seen the Polish Wikipedia entry about Friedrich Kellner. I truly appreciate your help. Perhaps others will also help now, when they see what you have started. Thank you. Scott Rskellner 17:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Now I am afraid the page will be erased. Could you please look at the discussion page and keep the robot from erasing the page? http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyskusja:Friedrich_Kellner Thank you very much. Scott Rskellner 18:57, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Friedrich Kellner on it.wiki
I will be very glad to improve your translation. --Andrea Cioffi (Talk to me!) 08:39, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Dear Professor I just made some changes to the Italian text, it's not perfect but now can be added to the Italian page so other contributors can further improve it. Regards. --Andrea Cioffi (Talk to me!) 10:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! It was a pleasure... let me know if I can help you in any other way. Ciao! --Andrea Cioffi (Talk to me!) 17:56, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm glad you found someone to do your translation for you. Sorry I didn't respond quicker! :: Salvo (talk) 17:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Quotations
Hello Scott! Thanks for responding so quickly regarding the quotations. If it's ok with you, I'd like to move the quotation discussion to the article's talk page to keep everything in one spot. Olessi 17:01, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

My Opposition the Friedrich Kellner diary
Thank you for your message. I have passed this article according to the GA criteria. Adjustments to the 11 items listed for review are well completed. To help the article keep its GA status, please make sure that all new information added to the article is accurate and properly cited. Altogether, the article reads well. Keep up the good work!-- VS talk 04:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * It has been my pleasure - as I say a good read - keep up the good work. You have more than enough skills to write on other articles outside of your Kellner interest. Cheers.-- VS  talk 04:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: Friedrich Kellner
Hello

Thankyou for your feedback regarding Friedrich Kellner; and indeed it is one of hundreds of articles I have recently assessed.

I am inclined to think that the article in question is indeed worthy of B class status. It has substantial citations, is fluent and coherent, is well illustrated and copy edited and provides an interesting read. For these reasons and also in relation to other articles I have assessed as B class, I have reassessed the article as B class. I'm sure you can appreciate any "refinings" that occur during my work, given the hundreds of articles I have dealt with in trying to be the working man and clear the log.

I would also recommend you continue your work as fruitfully as you can, as it would naturally good for this to become a Good Article and I would be pleased to see that. I have visited the site of Auschwitz and Auschwitz-Birkenau and have seen first hand (and also heard from a survivor) evidence of crimes committed by the Nazis that Kellner tried to record.

If there is anything else you wish to discuss, by all means message me.

Regards, WilliamH 22:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Video
Thanks for sending me the link to thr video about F. Skellner's life and mission. His personal endurance and historical work are testaments of the good and bad in the human spirit. Best wishes. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 07:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

E-mails re: Friedrich Kellner
There is a thread at the administrators incident noticeboard regarding your e-mails to people who have contributed to topics related to Hitler. It is being regarded as spam, and while I (and the people who have thanked you here) may not necessarily agree that it is spam per se, it may be regarded as bad form to send unsolicited e-mail to a large number of editors. Please feel free to comment in the thread if you wish. Avruch talk 20:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Response
I posted this at AN/I but I'm not sure if you saw it, as AN/I discussions can be hard to keep track of, so here it again:

''Thank you for responding, and for your apology via e-mail. There's no need to feel bad -- I wasn't offended or even bothered by this. My only concern is that Wikipedia's open email system not become a tool for mass-emailing, in general. It seems that nowadays, anywhere on the Internet where you post your email address is a place where people will scrounge to compile mailing list. I don't want to see this happen to Wikipedia, and allowing this practice even on occasion for benign reasons could mean opening the door for the gradual allowance of such a practice on a grander, more annoying scale. Informing people of things outside of the improvement of Wikipedia is not really something that should be handled through Wikipedia. You may want to find an online forum or other site more suited to this purpose -- or if you must, perhaps use the article's talk page instead, as a less-intrusive method of announcement.''

''I assure you there's been no harm done. Best of luck --  Equazcion •✗/C • 04:35, 2 Jan 2008 (UTC)''

Hi!
Fascinating. Thanks for the link. DBaba (talk) 20:00, 8 January 2008 (UTC)