User talk:Rslogo

April 2019
Hello, I'm Fylindfotberserk. I noticed that you recently removed content from Anita Hassanandani without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:52, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jammu. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:49, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Rslogo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Kargil district did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Kautilya3 (talk) 09:15, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mangla, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 15:18, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Khalistan movement, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  D Big X ray ᗙ  08:56, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Citizenship Amendment Act protests. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  D Big X ray ᗙ Happy Holidays!  20:35, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Citizenship Amendment Act protests. ''

on repeatedly adding BLP vios and unsourced conspiracy theories despite warning see    D Big X ray ᗙ Happy Holidays! '' 16:47, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Citizenship Amendment Act protests shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''

Article is under 1RR.

Stop adding this unsourced content you have already violated WP:1RR  D Big X ray ᗙ Happy Holidays! '' 16:49, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. El_C 18:01, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert
El_C 18:02, 19 December 2019 (UTC)