User talk:Rsmithlutheran

Welcome!

 * }

June 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Lutheran Church in Great Britain has been reverted. Your edit here to Lutheran Church in Great Britain was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://lutheranchurchingreatbritain.blogspot.com) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:53, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Lutheran Church in Great Britain has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. ''This was not a grammar correction. Your change to SS A&A was not correcting a link. Please seek consensus on Talk pages for these contentious changes. Thank you.'' DBaK (talk) 11:58, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to the page St Anne and St Agnes appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. DBaK (talk) 20:34, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Talk, please
Once again, can I respectfully suggest that you please take your proposed changes to the articles' Talk pages and seek consensus there? Continuing to edit in this way, with absent or misleading edit summaries, is doing no-one any favours. Honestly. The priority here is to build an encyclopaedia, not to right wrongs or express Lutheran politics, assuming that there is such a thing. Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 13:25, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Lutheran Church in Great Britain has been reverted. Your edit here to Lutheran Church in Great Britain was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://lutheranchurchingreatbritain.blogspot.com) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:03, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * }