User talk:Rsrikanth05/Archive December 2020

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:30, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:26, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Message
Glavkon (talk) 19:58, 29 December 2020 (UTC) Hi Sir, you recently reverted a few changed that I made. I made changes to improve those pages, with citation and removed a few unsubstantiated comments on those pages. The links inserted referred to similar pages that are already linked, but with more and updated content. One of the index providers that is allowed to link does not provide public data which makes it hard to substantiate the text, whereas the links I inserted show data for the interested readers.


 * Hi,, please read WP:RS. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 21:24, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Glavkon (talk) 04:31, 30 December 2020 (UTC) I've certainly done so, none of the links referred to anything that would fall into that category. The links added have the same type of function as other links within the articles on hedgefunds, i.e. a reference to a database (e.g. BarclayHedge, EurekaHedge, NilssonHedge which are all recognized database sources used by academics and professionals). The links also enhanced the articles, removing and clarifying existing biased statements on the function of some of the strategies. For instance, under the market-neutral article, I added a link that has also been published in a major trade publication, to verify a claim that Market Neutral strategies still have a low correlation to equities. On Global Macro I added links to public indices rather than the paid for indices that form part of the current wiki pages. So, I found your edits to be rather strange.