User talk:Rsrikanth05/Archive May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:30, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:12, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:31, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:24, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Rollback
Hello. Could you clarify for me why you think this edit is vandalism? CIreland (talk) 14:01, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

I have reverted your reversion and continued my edits. Please check the discussion page for justifications before jumping to conclusions of vandalism. If you were using some sort of automatic tool, I apologize.

I'll assume that this edit was an error, and I thank you for your veracity on these pages. It looks as if that in the past, that particular page was subject to some vandalism, and therefore heightened scrutiny is indeed justified. That heightened scrutiny and my own veracity led me to believe that campaign literature is not a suitable source for Wikipedia for a number of reasons. See the discussion page for additional info.Alaclerk (talk) 15:06, 28 May 2010 (UTC)