User talk:Rsschuyler

June 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=613053106 your edit] to Functional medicine may have broken the syntax by modifying 8 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:29, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring at Functional medicine
Your recent editing history at Functional medicine shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Please read the edit summaries at the article for the reasons why your edits were reverted. Please follow WP:BRD and start a discussion on the article's talk page. Don't try to insert that content again. It's in the wrong place and it's also a bit controversial, so you'll need to work out a consensus version with other editors. We create articles through a process of collaboration here. -- Brangifer (talk) 03:27, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Please stop removing content and start a discussion on the talk page. Theroadislong (talk) 21:41, 16 June 2014 (UTC)