User talk:Rsskga

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Unseen logo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Unseen logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:28, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of LS Worldwide Transportation
A tag has been placed on LS Worldwide Transportation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Blowdart | talk 22:44, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
I've reviewed your contributions and I believe there is a problem, which I raised at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. Wikipedia's core policies include verifiability, no original research, and neutral point of view. It appears that your contributions have not met these policies. I searched on the internet and quickly found that your contributions appear to all be on behalf of clients of All the Queen’s Men, and that you appear to be the prinicipal of that firm. Wikipedia has a conflict of interest guideline that applies to such circumstances. What it all boils down to is that you should not directly edit articles with which you have a conflict of interest but should instead use the article talk pages to propose edits. Whatever you write should conform to NPOV and avoid being promotional in any way (see WP:NOT). In addition, you should not cite your own press releases or internet postings as reliable sources for articles, except under specific conditions (see WP:RS). Feel free to contribute to topics unrelated to your business.  Will Beback   talk    00:33, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 819c5106c9f82ce6d2eca736d224bab7
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Nomination of Unseen (website) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Unseen (website) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Unseen (website) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 22:25, 29 April 2015 (UTC)