User talk:Rstory

 Hi Rstory, and Please excuse this intrusion as you have been around a bit already but if no one has said it before: Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read theIntroduction and check the Teahouse to contact Wikipedians who are available for assistance, or even for a chat. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Finding your way around:


 * Table of Contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.


 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
 * The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[Image:Signature_icon.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

 Good luck, and have fun. FWiW  Bzuk (talk) 18:10, 30 June 2013 (UTC).

Disambiguation link notification for May 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gustav Hamel, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Windsor, Burbage and Tamworth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Hick (MP), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ANVIL. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Felixstowe Porte Baby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RN. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
Your recent editing history at Felixstowe F.5 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Ahunt (talk) 15:04, 13 January 2015 (UTC)


 * I am sorry you feel the need to behave like this Ahunt, note my first edit 12 January was an err and I have not broken the three-revert rule any more than you have.Rstory (talk) 16:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Koolhoven 100ton flying boat drawing.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Koolhoven 100ton flying boat drawing.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Glenn Curtiss. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:46, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Nasmyth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scottish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited GWR Firefly Class, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Argus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Technical drawing of the Vickers Valentia flying boat.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Technical drawing of the Vickers Valentia flying boat.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RAF Felixstowe.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:RAF Felixstowe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:48, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rolls-Royce Condor.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rolls-Royce Condor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by)  11:38, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Porte
Could you please explain the meaning of this edit summary and why you are reverting that edit? Nikkimaria (talk) 18:48, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Not an answer. Could you please either stop reverting that edit or provide an actual explanation? Nikkimaria (talk) 20:04, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Again, rather than continuing to revert, could you please provide an actual explanation as to why that term should be linked? See WP:OVERLINK. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:26, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Hick model double beam engine.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Hick model double beam engine.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Advert for Hick Hargreaves &#38; Co. Ltd.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Advert for Hick Hargreaves &. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Advert for Hick Hargreaves &#38; Co. Ltd.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Advert for Hick Hargreaves &. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hick Hargreaves and Co. Ltd. advert.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Hick Hargreaves and Co. Ltd. advert.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:10, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hick Hargreaves and Co. Ltd. advert.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Hick Hargreaves and Co. Ltd. advert.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Hick Hargreaves and Co. Ltd. advert.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hick Hargreaves and Co. Ltd. advert.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Hick Hargreaves and Co. Ltd. advert.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hick Hargreaves and Co. Ltd. advert.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at WT:NFCC § File:Aerial view of Hick Hargreaves & Co. Ltd2.jpg
You are invited to join the discussion at WT:NFCC § File:Aerial view of Hick Hargreaves & Co. Ltd2.jpg. -- Marchjuly (talk) 15:04, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Images in gallery at B. Hick and Sons
I strongly concur with User:J Milburn here in the edit summary of this edit which re-removed the images from that gallery. The burden of proof is indeed on you, and nobody appears to be agreeing with your position that these are acceptable under WP:NFCC. Please do not restore them without gaining consensus that they do in fact meet WP:NFCC. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 17:56, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Borer, Hick Hargreaves &#38; Co. Ltd2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Borer, Hick Hargreaves &. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Aerial view of Hick Hargreaves &#38; Co. Ltd2.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Aerial view of Hick Hargreaves &. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hick model double beam engine.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hick model double beam engine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sloppy Joe&#39;s Bar, Havana (exterior).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sloppy Joe&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

B. Hick and Sons
Hi, this is about your change to the subtitle for B. Hick and Sons. The section was somewhat eclectic. I removed material about the former Post Office etc and tried to put together an account of what happened to the business and premises following the Smiths Group sale. I have no particularly fixed ideas what the section should be called but "Ownership changes" didn't cover it for me. It is a bit awkward because the format doesn't follow the standard encyclopedic format of an introductory section followed by history, and instead the article wanders about a bit. I came to this from the Edwards Vacuum page and want to ensure the two tie together neatly.Ed1964 (talk) 21:40, 24 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, bear in mind the article has evolved over some length of time including the Ownership changes section that has drawn in other observations that may not be so tightly in frame with the section title. The section about the former Post Office was added more recently and does require some blending I agree, but I doubt should be removed entirely together with some other details that I will restore in some way or other .Rstory (talk) 23:08, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Might I humbly suggest the article is restructured to begin with a very brief introduction followed by a history section containing subheadings, and then all the other stuff about family and mills using the kit, and other bits of local history etc can go in a series of other sections instead of abusing see also and external links. I am not a purist seeking to push the gallery to Wikimedia but it might all be easier if the gallery was treated as a gallery and not left to disrupt the flow of the main long history section (a few pics alongside exempted of course). Ed1964 (talk) 23:18, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

As far as the Post Office goes I struggled to see any relevance. It has nothing to do with the works site or business named at the top of the article and by the Edwards was just one of a multitude of firms that had carved up hicks product line - they just did the vacuum pumps. Ed1964 (talk) 23:22, 24 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The Soho Iron Works gallery has a relationship to the section above, but less so with the Ownership changes section below. The Post Office section was added for some reason the editor believed to be relevant at the time, but I would have to have a closer look at it before offering an opinion either way. It is not an easy task trying to source and jigsaw this together and I think care should be taken not to lose information under 'tidying' or 'simplyfying' once the information is there.


 * I will look at the MOS for the sections I restored and revise accordingly - they can be moved to the talk page as an alternative if really necessary.Rstory (talk) 00:23, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

See also section
Hi,

This comment relates to your reversion of the See Also section of B. Hick and Sons. The content is clearly contrary to MOS:SEEALSO - it even included a bunch of prose and citations! I can see that some of the material may form bases for sections after introduction and history, much like the list of mills section but they do not belong en masse in a See also section. That they have sat there inappropriately does not seem especially relevant to me. There is no Statute of Limitations in Wikipedia as far as I am aware.

I am sorry you have chosen to revert instead of engaging in a discussion. As you will have seen from the changes I have made, I have not sought to change the meaning of the page, just to put it in an encyclopedid format with appropriate entry points for others to introduce additional material.

Do you want me, or anybody else, to work on the structure of the page or not?Ed1964 (talk) 22:52, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)