User talk:Rthreethree/Jen Christiansen

1) What does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? This article does a good job with stating the facts about the topic without any bias or unnecessary fluff. I also think there are plenty of citations and you can fact check quite easily.

2) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement? I think some of the sentences could be restructured in a way that makes them easier to read. This might be separating run on sentences into multiple smaller sentences. I think the "work" section could need a little more detail and restructured so that it created more of a cohesive thought instead of a collection of facts. I think these changes would make the article easier to read and understand what is trying to be said.

3) What’s the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? I think the most important thing is to review the "Work" section and make it more cohesive, as said above.

4) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know! I liked how the article is broken up between education, work, etc. It is organized very well and I think my article could benefit from being spaced out a bit more. I also think mine could benefit from taking out some of the adjectives when describing the subject's accomplishments in order to eliminate bias. I think you're on to a great start!