User talk:Rtyq2/Archive

Speedy deletion of Pure Rock
A tag has been placed on Pure Rock requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Non-dropframe (talk) 20:38, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Beano (talk) 03:20, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Someone else undid it Thanks, Ainlina(box)? 20:03, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar
Hmm, thx... --Say Headcheese!-- hexa Chord 2  05:48, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Re:Rollback
You can has rullbawk. :)  jj137  (  talk )  23:29, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem.  jj137  (  talk )  17:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

J._P._Morgan
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J._P._Morgan&diff=253041204&oldid=253041171 Sorry about that reversion I fixed it. --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 19:52, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It's fine, I do that accidentally sometimes too. Rtyq2 (talk) 19:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Joshua Shaw
It is now no longer a stub. I have covered his early life and inventions although his artistic career needs work.

Your nomination for speedy deletion on Andrew Curnow
Hello, Rtyq2. You have nominated a page for speedy deletion, but I found it unapparent that you did so.

I looked thru the article, and although it doesn't get the point across the same as other articles, there is ABSOLUTLEY no reason to nominate this article for deletion, particulary speedy deletion. This may need some more information, but it does describe how the person has had a significant achievements.

If you are challenging my challenge, PLEASE leave me a message on my talk page ASAP.

K50 Dude  (TALK)

P.S....I have corrected some Gramarr errors, since some were needed.

Warning Vandals
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: You may already know about them, but you might find Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. --ITasteLikePaint (talk) 23:12, 21 November 2008 (UTC)