User talk:Ru-G Corp.

Image:MEI_WIKI_image.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:MEI_WIKI_image.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 23:54, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Blyth Education


A tag has been placed on Blyth Education, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Vrenator    talk   14:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Blyth Education for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blyth Education is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Blyth Education until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Vrenator    talk   09:53, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Bethenny Frankel
Hi RuG, I've changed the sale price back to $100 million per the three sources which say that $8.1 million is incorrect. I've made a thorough explantion here. Please discuss on the talk page if you disagree rather than edit warring with me. Thanks my friend. -- — Keithbob • Talk  • 15:53, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for fixing that and being very polite about it. Sorry for the unnecessary undo. Ru-G Corp. (talk) 01:57, 24 July 2013 (UTC)