User talk:Rubberducky3000

January 2021
Hello, I'm Jerm. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to All the Right Reasons have been [ disallowed by an edit filter] because they did not appear constructive. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Additionally, if you believe this was an edit filter false positive, please report it here. Also, feel free to ask for assistance at the Teahouse whenever you like. Thank you. Jerm (talk) 17:12, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --   LuK3      (Talk)   17:57, 4 January 2021 (UTC)  You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 18:14, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Wait why am I blocked I stopped messing around after I was warned, I instead tried inserting stuff onto the pages that are under my ownership but the system wouldn't let me. Please help I am very confused here. My constructive edits were revert too?
 * First, nobody owns Wikipedia articles. Second, you need to make the unblock request properly, as shown in the block message above - Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail 19:15, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Irregardless of what the site rules are, the pages I create on this site are in actuality my own intellectual property and I am actually guaranteed protection from tampering per the US constitution. My right to free speech is also guaranteed by the constitution. It doesn't appear you have a leg to stand on. I will be unblocked in due time. Have a good day. Rubberducky3000 (talk) 01:50, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Firstly, when you edit you agree to license your contribution in a way that specifically allows tampering and modification. Secondly, please take a look at the Constitution, specifically where it says "Congress shall make no law abridging... freedom of speech." Wikipedia is not congress. The Constitution is irrelevant here. Zoozaz1 talk  04:21, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * No, that is crap. I did not agree to anything. I especially did not agree for my work to be used by others. I feel as if the admins are portraying me as a vandal. I admit to the edit I made at the Nickel Back page. But why indefinite block? Rubberducky3000 (talk) 00:39, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Right before you click publish changes, a notice says "By publishing changes, you agree to the Terms of Use, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL." The CC BY-SA 3.0 license allows anyone to use and/modify your work (with attribution). Also, see Guide to appealing blocks. Zoozaz1 talk  00:44, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * That is misleading and quite frankly,, entrapment and I will not take any of it. I don't want my wiki worse used elsewhere other than on pages that I own (I created them and based on basic copywrite laws I own them) I'll ask the admins about this. Rubberducky3000 (talk) 22:40, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

While blocked from editing, are you also blocked from creating pages? I feel as if drafts would not fall into the editing category. Also, since the issue was with me vandalizing articles that belong to other people, I will just stick to writing the articles that I create. I am just curious.
 * Yes, you are blocked from creating new pages as well. pandakekok9 (talk) 05:44, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay, that is definitely a freedom of speech violation. While I can understand blocking me from editing pages that belong to other pages by other people given my contribution to Nickel Back, I am GUARUNTEED the ability to create and write articles per the first amendment. Wikipedia is a nonprofit, publicly funded project. I have a right to my own intellectual property here. Rubberducky3000 (talk) 00:39, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a publicly funded project. It has no relation to the government, congress, the first amendment, or the Constitution. You are not guaranteed to the ability to edit. Zoozaz1 talk  00:44, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * if Wikipedia is not publicly funded, then how is it free? Rubberducky3000 (talk) 22:40, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Hint: It's voluntary work. pandakekok9 (talk) 03:59, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

In the event of an unblock, does the original blocking admin face negative consequences from the community for poor judgement?}}
 * If the block was made in poor judgement, possibly- though this block wasn't. If you aren't going to make an unblock request, there is nothing more to do here. 331dot (talk) 08:00, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Note that it is clear you fundamentally misunderstand your constitutional rights, copyright, and Wikipedia. Either that or you are outright trolling. Please take the time to read the policies and guidelines we've linked to you and stop with the complete and utter nonsense you've been spouting above. Otherwise, you'll likely lose access to this talk page. We are all volunteers here and don't need to deal with this sort of thing. --Yamla (talk) 17:22, 16 June 2021 (UTC)