User talk:Rubenstein Neil

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Callanecc (talk) 02:21, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Computer Systems Institute
HI Rubenstein Neal, sorry about that. I have no problem with the article as is, however as the {{Computer Systems Institute|namespace]] is protected I am in the process of having the protection reviewed. Callanecc (talk) 01:34, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Callanecc (talk) 08:07, 27 May 2012 (UTC)


 * This is from User:Jimfbleak (the adminstrator who protected the Computer Systems Institute page:
 * ""The content of the submitted page is in essence the same as that deleted five times by five different admins (and obviously the nominators for CSD took a similar view. The article basically says "this is what we are selling... this is how we are accredited to do that.." — nothing about the company itself other that who founded it, and where its HQ is. There is no real history, and since it doesn't give basic facts like number of employees, number of students, turnover or profits, I'm not sure that it even demonstrates notability. To me, it's just a sales pitch""

- User:Jimfbleak


 * Once the above points are addressed in the aricle let me know (via my talk page) and I'll have a look.Callanecc (talk) 08:14, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

I have addressed (I hope) all the issues regarding the article you previously reviewed. I added a lot more statistics and sections covering financial aid & tuition along with statistics around student life. Please let me know your thoughts at this point. Rubenstein Neil (talk) 04:40, 1 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I think the article addresses more about the Institute itself rather than what it provides, so well done - a good start. I think including the total number of students (rather than just the statistics) as well as how many are in each year would add to the article. I would also suggest (if you haven't already) looking at similar pages (for similar institutions) on Wikipedia and having a look at the information included on those pages (such as notable alumni). There are also sections of the article which would be better as prose rather than a list but that is something which can be fixed after a possible move into mainspace. Callanecc (talk) 05:18, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

What are the next steps then? Is the article ready to be considered for the mainspace? fyi, I do have the total number of students in the Infobox. Thanks again Rubenstein Neil (talk) 13:46, 1 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Sorry missed that. I've asked the admin who protected the page in mainspace to have a look. Just need to wait and see what he thinks. Callanecc (talk) 01:54, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Computer Systems Institute, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Callanecc (talk) 06:10, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Talkback
Callanecc (talk) 12:39, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Computer Systems Institute logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Computer Systems Institute logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:00, 11 April 2016 (UTC)