User talk:Rublov/Archive 1

Mohamed Abdullahi Mohamed
WP:3RR "An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert. Violations of the rule often attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Fourth reverts just outside the 24-hour period may also be taken as evidence of edit-warring, especially if repeated or combined with other edit-warring behavior." See WP:3RRNO for exceptions.

You may be in violation of the 3RR rule, please desist from edit warring. Amirah  talk  01:59, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * User:AmirahBreen You are also at three reverts on removing that tag. OhNo itsJamie Talk 04:29, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Fontainebleau, Florida
Hi! For Lennar Corporation I saw this edit and I clarified. The postal address of the headquarters is "Miami, Florida" but it's actually physically outside of the Miami city limits. It is in Fontainebleau, Florida which is a census-designated place. WhisperToMe (talk) 05:55, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for clarifying that. Rublov (talk) 16:05, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Blood Meridian
I would like to suggest that you revert Blood Meridian to your "missing period" edit. Everything from there was egregiously pernicious to the article. One example is reverting to a problematic plot summary and then tagging it as a problematic plot summary. Untitled50reg (talk) 18:10, 21 January 2021 (UTC)


 * I believe that we agree that the plot summary needs to be shorter, but I think that interest is better served by trimming the existing summary. If you'd like to work together to improve it, I'd be happy to continue this discussion on the talk page. Rublov (talk) 18:43, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Ramon Mercader
Joseph Hansen wrote that there were rumors only that any of these awards had been given to Mercader in absentia in 1940s. Though Ramon Mercader could be freed in 1953 Jaques Mornard and the Soviet government refused to recognize him as Ramon Mercader and this, in Hansen's opinion, was the main obstacle to free him in 1953 in 7 years before the end of the term and not in 4 months. Ramon Mercader had other orders and medals to display that he was the participant of the WWII on the Soviet side and was not serving any terms in Mexican prisons. But he had only one order of Lenin. The sister of Ramon Montserrat initially was the wife of the leader of the International bridages of Spain, opposing Mussolini. She was to use the documents of her cousin to live in Italy. Please see the biography of her son in Wikipedia. He always told that his mother had been the sister, and not the cousin of Ramon Mercader. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SSt001 (talk • contribs) 11:52, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Order of Lenin, the Gold Star of the Hero and the title of the Hero of the Soviet Union, 1960


 * Let's take this discussion to Talk:Ramón Mercader. Rublov (talk) 11:59, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

RfC notice
This is a neutral notice sent to all non-bot/non-blocked registered users who edited Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics in the past year that there is a new request for comment at. Nardog (talk) 10:55, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your help desk question
You did not get an answer to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archives/2021_June_21#Easier_way_to_see_a_page's_move_history? this question] but it's something I'd like to know the answer to myself. This might be a question for WP:VPT.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  21:52, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , I actually asked this question to Buidhe and she suggested looking at the page history of the article's talk page, which is better than nothing though still far from ideal. If I have time, I'll ask at the village pump. Rublov (talk) 23:47, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I'd like to see what you find out.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  15:25, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , I asked again at Village pump (technical) Rublov (talk) 16:36, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Unusual articles
Hey! I noticed you removed my edits relating to rapper Eminem on Wikipedia:Unusual Articles in the section relating to "Gerbilling".

While I completely understand why you did this, I believe you may have missed the humorous remark I was attempting to make.

You see, on Eminem's 2005 song "FACK", he talks extensively about a sexual encounter involving a gerbil.

Since then, the song has become sort of an in-joke among Eminem fans due to its absurd nature and humourousness.

While reading this article, I noticed that a lot of the descriptions contained humourous jokes/references.

So when I made this edit, I was hoping that some fellow fans of Eminem like myself might notice the reference and appreciate it, and find it humourous.

I do agree that I should have summarized this in the edit though.

I hope you understand and will allow me to make this edit.

Thanks!


 * Thanks for the clarification. Since the sentence introduces the practice as an "urban legend" and the page is not in the main namespace, I guess it's okay. I would refrain from introducing it anywhere else, though, because it could be a WP:BLP violation. Rublov (talk) 10:43, 29 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi Rublov! I do not see how "AAAAAAAAAA... Oh" is related to the building article. I googled for the meaning and could not find it.  Perhaps you can help me see it.  Thank you. --Taweetham (talk) 04:12, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , I think it's meant to be the reaction of someone who mistook the building for a giant robot on first sight. Hence the description: That's not a giant robot looming in Bangkok.
 * I don't think it's very clever or funny, but since all the other captions in this and related articles are humorous or offbeat, I didn't think it should be changed to something that is merely descriptive. Rublov (talk) 10:13, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I thought it was a vandalism on the page so I made a quick change to something descriptive.  I did not notice that the description is intended to be humorous. --Taweetham (talk) 09:48, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , no worries. If you can think of something funnier feel free to replace it. Rublov (talk) 10:15, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , no worries. If you can think of something funnier feel free to replace it. Rublov (talk) 10:15, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

User Warnings after Revert
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you.--Theagentofblight (talk) 14:26, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , thank you for the reminder. I will be more conscientious about this in the future. Rublov (talk) 16:14, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

rewrite tag on Disappearance of Michele Anne Harris
Thanks for taking that tag off ... I was planning to do it myself at some point since the IP in question never responded to my request for specifics, but having done most of the work developing the article I didn't want to seem like I was exercising ownership. Having someone else see that nothing in the article really justified that tag is appreciated.

I suspect the tagger was the same one who made the edit I had reverted just before it in the edit history. It's the only edit by that editor, searching for that username reveals someone else who says they live in that general area, and the IP resolves to Vestal, just on the edge of Tioga County. And I suspect their real issue was that I had reverted their edit (for very good reasons) and didn't know any better way of following up. Daniel Case (talk) 22:28, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , sure thing, I read the article and did not feel the maintenance tag was warranted. Also, I just started a discussion at Template talk:September 11 attacks that you may be interested in. Rublov (talk) 04:06, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

A goat for you!
Thanks so much for copyediting first homosexual movement! I really appreciated both your edits and the suggestions for improvement on the talk page.

(t &#183; c)  buidhe  20:47, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you, it was a pleasure to read a well-written and well-researched article. Rublov (talk) 20:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)



Sima Yi
can u copyedit Sima Yi page too, if u don't mind? the page suffered from too many redundant sections & unnecessary paragraphs Ahendra (talk) 18:38, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , yes, it looks like that article needs some work. I'd recommend listing it at WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests I may have time to work on it in the future, but if I don't someone else will. Rublov (talk) 18:46, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 * sure, thx before, ill try to submit it to copy edit request first. Ahendra (talk) 23:39, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice
–– FormalDude  talk 05:57, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , sorry for the late reply, but I read WP:ACDS twice and I still don't understand what discretionary sanctions are, concretely. Would you mind explaining? Rublov (talk) 20:16, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Sacrifice (Oates novel)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Sacrifice (Oates novel) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 21:41, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Query
Hello I've just done your request at WP:RM/TR. Thank you for noticing the undiscussed moves. I am puzzled on why to rename the disambiguation page made by the mover. Do you have any suggestions. Cheers -- Megan B....  It’s all coming to me till the end of time  20:48, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * , thank you for reverting the move. I think Republic of Afghanistan (1973—1978) should be moved to Republic of Afghanistan (disambiguation), which is where it was before. Also, the same user "fixed" a bunch of links to point to the new targets... is there a better way to undo all these changes, besides reverting them manually? Rublov (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I've moved it back, Thanks. Regarding the links, am not aware of any quicker method besides the manual way. Meanwhile I've left a warning on the users talk page since they made an undiscussed move and also seemed to have performed a cut and paste move. Thank you for all your hard work. Cheers Megan B....   It’s all coming to me till the end of time  21:10, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I need to attend to something, but if the changed links aren't fixed by the time I'm back I'll take a stab at it. Rublov (talk) 21:23, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Actually, since they mainly changed links to Republic of Afghanistan to link to Republic of Afghanistan (1973—1978) instead, the edits don't need to be reverted as the latter redirects to the former. Rublov (talk) 22:19, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Sacrifice (Oates novel)
The article The Sacrifice (Oates novel) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Sacrifice (Oates novel) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 17:21, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Henry Morton Stanley
This is regarding your reverts to biased statements about Henry Morton Stanley's, apparently basing it of on Tim Zeal's work which is in no ways representative of the legacy divide which anything colonial comes up with. I had recommend you to revert back to neutral language in introduction ,made via my edits and not partake in edit warring again on further edits made in the introduction of that article. 1autumnLeaf (talk) 03:49, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I have added a citation for the claim in the introduction. If you wish to further contest this point, you should do so at Talk:Henry Morton Stanley, but you will need to provide references to reliable sources to substantiate your interpretation. Rublov (talk) 15:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * You have completely missed the point of “ legacy divide which anything colonial comes up” and engaged in edit warring again. I have cited one now that is in contrast to your biased cite before. I had recommended you to cite your link besides mine, without the biased language in the intro and let the awesome wiki community make up their minds for themselves. If you have anymore trouble the talk page@ Henry Mortan Stanley is open for your contention but you will have to provide substantial proof and not an opinionated piece or else refrain from edit warring.thank1autumnLeaf (talk) 08:12, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Copy edit notes for Survivor: Australian Outback
Thanks for your copy edit of Survivor: The Australian Outback for the GOCE's February Blitz. I have a few notes, mostly MOS stuff, since this copy edit request was going for GAN. These are fairly minor points, please receive them constructively.


 * it was originally shown between January 28, to May 23, 2001. ... in northern Queensland from October 23, 2000, through December 3, 2000. Be mindful of date formats and numeric ranges.  From-through works (from-to is more common) but between-to doesn't.  Between works best with and.  Also, you don't need the comma after 'January 28' and in the second range since both years are in 2000, you can omit the first 2000 as assumed.  See MOS:DATERANGE for more examples.
 * took place from October 23, 2000, through December 3, 2000 at Goshen need a comma after the second 2000. (MOS:DATECOMMA) Could optionally remove the first 2000 (and commas).
 * on January 28, 2001 to 43.5 million viewers need a comma after 2001.
 * to have more than standard 39 days of gameplay. remove 'standard' or replace with 'the standard'.
 * The last remaining player is awarded a prize of $1,000,000. Because this is an American show set and filmed in Australia, there may be some confusion about whether this is American or Australian dollars. Consider using US$1,000,000. (first occurrence only)
 * The final seven eliminated contestants made up the jury Since this is going to GA, I would change made up &rarr; comprised, which is more formal.
 * Jerri and Mitchell both received a vote at Tribal Council both &rarr; each
 * resulting in a 3-3 tie .. the second vote was still 2-2 ... they wanted to go in 6-4 with ranges like this, use a en dash instead of a hyphen: 3–3, 2–2 and 6–4.  In general, hyphens are used for conjunction (associating things together) and dashes for disjunction (separating things or showing opposition).  If you don't have a keyboard shortcut for en dashes, you can use &amp;ndash; (MOS:DASH).
 * The winning tribe would receive a picnic basket of Doritos and Mountain Dew. Stating the brand names might be considered promotional and I'd understand some editors genericizing these (tortilla chips and soft drinks) if they aren't mentioned elsewhere in the article (ie: if they aren't needed for context).
 * Michael yelled out in pain, and ran to the water and dove in. maybe smooth this a bit for flow: Michael yelled in pain and dove into the water.
 * As the pain intensifying, his tribe watched &rarr; While his pain intensified, his tribe watched
 * Their prize was a helicopter ride to the Great Barrier Reef, where they would have lunch and snorkel &rarr; had
 * In the reward challenge, the contestants' loved ones would be asked five survival trivia questions via instant messaging. The winner would receive a 30 minute Internet chat with loved ones back home and a $500 shopping spree to buy presents. Tina's husband and children, Elisabeth's family, Rodger's wife, daughter, and son-in-law, Keith's girlfriend, and Colby's mom answered the questions for their Survivors. Tina's family got 4 answers correct. I would probably have rephrased this to tell a narrative of what happened rather than explaining the rules and then what happened. (This also avoids having to change tenses.) The contestants' loved ones – Tina's husband and children, Elisabeth's family, Rodger's wife, daughter, and son-in-law, Keith's girlfriend, and Colby's mother – remotely participated in the reward challenge, answering trivia questions via instant messaging. Tina's family correctly answered 4 questions and won a 30-minute Internet chat with her and a $500 shopping spree.
 * which helped them start their fire back up. &rarr; which helped them restart their fire.
 * Back at camp, they received a mirror and a scale in tree mail to see how much they had lost and how they looked &rarr; how much weight they had lost
 * won his fourth straight immunity &rarr; consecutive immunity
 * Colby finally chose philanthropy over strategy and picked Tina Remove 'finally', which is one of those words to watch. It implies that the writer thinks what follows took longer than it should have. We should keep our opinions out of it and just state the facts. The reader should be able to make their own conclusion if something was overdue.
 * Colby and Tina both pleaded both &rarr; each. If it's a subtle distinction, both suggests that they pled collectively while each means that they did it individually.
 * as the 3rd greatest season of the series 3rd &rarr; third. We generally write-out numbers from 0 to 9 (MOS:SPELL09)
 * 10th out of 30 Here, keep them both as numerals, so that they're easier to compare. (MOS:NUMNOTES)

Thanks again for your copy edit. Please if you have any questions. Barnstars should be awarded shortly. – Reidgreg (talk) 03:05, 21 February 2022 (UTC)


 * thank you for this feedback. Ruбlov (talk) 13:16, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thanks so much for your copyedit of the torture article! It's a difficult subject to deal with.

(t &#183; c)  buidhe  02:55, 21 March 2022 (UTC) 

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Temple (LDS Church)&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 01:30, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Pruitt–Igoe
With this edit you removed sourced content with the edit summary "this never happened". Why did you remove this? Could you please tell me your source to support that both of these "never happened"? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:24, 27 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Ramoth 2007, p. 170: "The parklike setting that was supposed to surround the high-rise buildings was anything but parklike. To save money, most of the landscaping was omitted. There were only a few trees. Instead of towers-in-a-park, Pruitt-Igoe was towers surrounded by wasteland." I didn't mean that the original content was wrong, just that the proposed "river of trees" was never created. I removed it because it didn't belong where it was; I may restore it in a different section. Ruбlov (talk) 18:33, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * It added context. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:35, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Kirby Forensic Psychiatric Center
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 23 March 2022 (UTC) the automation of this function is in beta testing mode—please let me know if I've screwed up! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 23:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Russian-occupied territories&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 23:31, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Bridge Apartments
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 8 April 2022 (UTC) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 02:45, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Archives of the Planet
Hello! Your submission of The Archives of the Planet at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! M h hossein  talk 05:50, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Archives of the Planet
The article The Archives of the Planet you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Archives of the Planet for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of A. Parrot -- A. Parrot (talk) 03:21, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Rublov

Thank you for creating Peter Gilbert (filmmaker).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:45, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for The Archives of the Planet
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 15 May 2022 (UTC)


 * - this was a fascinating article and I enjoyed reading it. Nice work! —Ganesha811 (talk) 15:06, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I enjoyed researching and writing it. Ruбlov (talk • contribs) 15:17, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Just read it, wonderful article! I have to say, the images don't look like they were taken over 100 years ago! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 17:10, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 05:58, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Sacrifice (Oates novel)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Sacrifice (Oates novel) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 17:01, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Sacrifice (Oates novel)
The article The Sacrifice (Oates novel) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Sacrifice (Oates novel) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 11:22, 6 June 2022 (UTC)


 * I have no idea why the bot thinks this has failed. It passed. —Kusma (talk) 11:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pruitt–Igoe
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pruitt–Igoe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 15:20, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pruitt–Igoe
The article Pruitt–Igoe you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pruitt–Igoe for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 17:00, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pruitt–Igoe
The article Pruitt–Igoe you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Pruitt–Igoe for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 15:41, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hoop Dreams
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hoop Dreams you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 11:40, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hoop Dreams
The article Hoop Dreams you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hoop Dreams for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 12:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

hello there
Hello, I'm new in Wikipedia, I'd like if you could help me here א.ס. כהן (talk) 11:37, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello א.ס. כהן, what do you need help with? Ruбlov (talk • contribs) 11:56, 23 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Mostly with Template indexs א.ס. כהן (talk) 12:06, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Could you be more specific? What page are you editing? What are you trying to accomplish? Ruбlov (talk • contribs) 13:18, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!
Happy Holidays text.png Hello Rublov: Enjoy the holiday season&#32;and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, —Ganesha811 (talk) 15:36, 24 December 2022 (UTC) Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message
 * , thank you! rblv (talk) 18:19, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

 * Thank you ! rblv (talk) 20:48, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 111 Eighth Avenue
The article 111 Eighth Avenue you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:111 Eighth Avenue and Talk:111 Eighth Avenue/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 111 Eighth Avenue
The article 111 Eighth Avenue you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:111 Eighth Avenue for comments about the article, and Talk:111 Eighth Avenue/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 17:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Script
Hey there, Rublov. I was just trying out your script, User:Rublov/anonymize, and was wondering if you could make a super, super minor adjustment for me: change  (in lowercase) to   (in title case). It would just look more consistent with the other links at the top of the page. Thank you! InfiniteNexus (talk) 02:02, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * , done. rblv (talk) 03:31, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Happy new year too! InfiniteNexus (talk) 03:41, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I installed the same script, but I still see my username. Its right beside the bell.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:29, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * , it stopped working because of the new Vector skin. I have updated it to work again now. rblv (talk) 22:40, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, it does, thank you. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 11:04, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations Backlog Drive reminder
The August 2023 Good Article Nominations Backlog Drive is at the halfway mark, and has seen incredible progress, dropping the backlog from 638 to 359 unreviewed articles -- a 43.7% reduction in only fifteen days! But we still have over two weeks to go, and there are plenty of articles left to review:


 * We've gone from 14 nominations 270+ days old and 65 nominations 180+ days old to 2 and 0 respectively. No more articles will reach 270+ status during the drive, and only three more will reach 180+ if unreviewed, so this is your last chance to get the higher age bonuses!
 * We still have plenty of articles in the 90+ range, but the list is shrinking fast.
 * Some articles need new reviewers, either because they're officially on second opinion or because the original reviews were deleted or invalidated. You can help prevent these articles from waiting longer!
 * While there are starting to be clear favourites for the Content Review Medal of Merit, the field is still very open. A late entrant can still pull an upset to get the most reviews in the drive!

And remember: if you've done reviews, you should log them at the backlog drive page for points, so they can be tracked towards your awards at the end.

Thanks for signing up for the drive, and I hope to see you reviewing! Vaticidalprophet 02:01, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

You have received this message as a participant in the August 2023 Good Article Nominations Backlog Drive who has logged one or no reviews. This is a one-off massmessage. If you wish to opt out of all massmessages, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.