User talk:RuchiReddy

Enterpriseforce
Thanks for message. You seem to have created this account to evade the block on User:Enterpriseforce. Since you have not misused the account, I'll let it go for now, but if you attempt to edit Enterpriseforce or anything connected with it without getting that account unblocked, I'll block you as a sock puppet of that account. The unblock request procedure is in the block message.

I deleted the article because Jimfbleak - talk to me?  12:26, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. You gave no references. If you don't want an article to be immediately assessed as it stands, it should be created as a draft, not an articlet
 * it's all about what the company does, little about the company itself, not even a location, although the text implies its somewhere in India. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, turnover or profits.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: focused on creating the world's largest supply chain... optimizing cost and reach for leading companies... India's largest supply chain analytics platform &mdash; basically a mission statement and a couple of unsourced facts
 * the article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. Employees are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   .
 * Just to make it clear, even if you make the COI declaration above, your original account is still blocked, and whether you declare your COI as above or not, you will be blocked if you recreate the article while the first block stands


 * The unblock procedure is in the pink box on User talk:Enterpriseforce, which you can still edit. I won't consider any request myself because that's not fair to you, but it will alert admins who normally reply within a day or so. Note that there are conditions to being unblocked Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:39, 7 April 2016 (UTC)