User talk:Ruchika2017

Speedy deletion nomination of AccountSight
Hello Ruchika2017,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged AccountSight for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

 Bfpage  let's talk... 00:33, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of AccountSight


The article AccountSight has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —  InsertCleverPhraseHere  00:34, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of AccountSight


A tag has been placed on AccountSight, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SamHolt6 (talk) 03:36, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

AccountSight
Wikipedia articles should be of publishable and acceptable quality before being submitted. There is usually a grace period of 10-15 min, or slightly longer if an under construction tag is placed, but 2 hours is not a reasonable time frame to leave an article of clearly unacceptable quality on the wiki in the article space. You could work on a draft instead, and publish once it is up to article standards (by creating an article at Draft:AccountSight). You can also use Articles for Creation to help you verify that your article is up to scratch before publishing. —  InsertCleverPhraseHere  05:31, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:AccountSight. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 05:38, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Ruchika2017, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. SwisterTwister  talk  17:13, 27 October 2017 (UTC)