User talk:Rudfish

May 2017
Hello, Rudfish. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Draft:Rudspice, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.

Also, the page has the following problems, which make it unsuitable as a Wikipedia article.
 * 1) It gives the impression that it s intended to publicise or promote the product it refers to, but editing for the purpose of promotion is not permitted by Wikipedia policy.
 * 2) It gives no indication that the product is significant enough to be the subject of a Wikipedia article. You may like to read the notability guidelines to see what is required. FAQ/Organizations may also be helpful. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:22, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rudspice (May 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rudspice and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  05:08, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Rudspice concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rudspice, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 5 October 2017 (UTC)