User talk:Ruferto1

July 2012
Hello. Please stop re-adding the list of "featured articles" to the Beth Shak article. It's trivial, self-promoting and I believe you have a conflict of interest, in which case you should not be editing the article at all. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:17, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Very well, i'll put relevant ones the general references section.
 * No, you should put them on the talk page for discussion, you have a clear COI. You do also realise that these links aren't indexed by Google or anyone else, don't you?  The Rambling Man (talk) 12:32, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

I don't have a COI. I'll take out the irrelevant pdfs as I said. Those wouldn't be indexed on google, the other ones would be.
 * Well I know for a fact that you do have a COI so please stop editing her page. If someone thinks those refs are useful to add and enhance the article's encyclopedic value, then they will.  I'll move them to the talkpage for you so the discussion as to whether they should be included or not can be conducted there. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:36, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mila Shak
Hello Ruferto1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mila Shak for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Mduvekot (talk) 02:33, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Mila Shak. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 00:36, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Mila Shak
Hello, Ruferto1,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Mila Shak should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Mila Shak.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Mduvekot (talk) 01:37, 8 July 2017 (UTC)