User talk:Rufufur

April 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Meidum, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 21:40, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Pyramid of Khafre. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Yoshi24517 ( Chat ) ( Online ) 21:43, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pyramid of Khafre, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Pyramid of Khafre was changed by Rufufur (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928229 on 2023-04-13T21:52:57+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:53, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Pyramid of Khafre shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Please stop. - L'Mainerque - (Disturb my slumber) -  21:59, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ponyo bons mots 22:09, 13 April 2023 (UTC)


 * This edit is vandalism
 * This edit is vandalism
 * Your repeated use of the trout template at L'Mainerque was disruptive
 * The remainder of your edits were to edit war at an article you had previously vandalized.
 * ↑This is why you are blocked↑.-- Ponyo bons mots 22:53, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

I could have been less aggressive with my edits.
On Pyramid of Khafre, I now realize I could have just changed it to the more correct "modern day Giza." instead of fully reverting.

Still, you spamming my talkpage when I indicated I did not want you there at that time was still not the best way to go. Also, the troutings were a bit unjustified imo.

Either way, I'm sorry if I made you angry or hurt.

- L'Mainerque - (Disturb my slumber) -  22:17, 13 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I apologize for the troutings and spamming as I did not see the message. I was just trying to get in touch with you about the page. Rufufur (talk) 22:19, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I understand. The formatting and tone though were just not the right way to go, though I understand it might've been a "heat of the moment" thing. It might have also been better if you pinged me by doing L'Mainerque on the articles talk page, though you might've not known of that. I realize my edit summary directing you to the articles talk page might've been confusing, and you mistook it as a result.
 * Your unblock template is broken and not correctly formatted, do you want me to fix it, or do you want to remove it and take a good read of the guide to appealing blocks, as I don't think your current request will be successful as it was made in haste.
 * I hope you and I are able to get past this.
 * - L'Mainerque - (Disturb my slumber) -  22:29, 13 April 2023 (UTC)