User talk:Rufusking9

August 2020
Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Australian Football League—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 18:10, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rufus King, you may be blocked from editing. Schazjmd  (talk)  18:13, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alastair Clarkson, you may be blocked from editing. Jprg1966 (talk) 20:05, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Disruptive editing on Bailey Smith
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bailey Smith. Doggo375 (talk) 07:40, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Hello, I'm Indyguy. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to St Peters Lutheran College have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse.   Indyguy (talk) 03:27, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hong Kong. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — MarkH21talk 03:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rufus William King


A tag has been placed on Rufus William King requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. SunDawn (talk) 04:45, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Jamarra Ugle-Hagan moved to draftspace - no citations - see WP:BLP and WP:RS
An article you recently created, Jamarra Ugle-Hagan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JW 1961 Talk 13:29, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jamarra Ugle-Hagan (May 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jamarra Ugle-Hagan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jamarra Ugle-Hagan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jamarra_Ugle-Hagan Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bkissin&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jamarra_Ugle-Hagan reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 14:29, 14 May 2021 (UTC)