User talk:Rufuspaisley

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Pr aty ya  (have a chat?) 05:44, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FeralOink (talk) 12:59, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello Rufus! I just reviewed your Afc for Paul Slocum. I left very detailed recommendations, as I think Mr. Slocum is definitely notable, and very worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia (a lot more than lots of other stuff...!) The writing style is fine, no longer colloquial. Please read my suggestions.

Here are the URLs that I promised I would leave for you, which are consistent with NPOV policy, rather than Mr. Slocum's resume:
 * Rhizome Editorial "Artist Profile: Paul Slocum" by ORIT GAT, Sep 27th, 2011
 * Very good detail Wired Magazine "Interview: Chiptune Artist Paul Slocum, Tree Wave" by Eliot Van Buskirk, Nov. 28, 2007
 * Dallas Observer blogs "The Video Art of the 1980s...", Sep 12 2012, see 5th paragraph
 * Dallas Observer "Intro Kashioboy...", 2009, see 4th paragraph
 * Dallas Observer blogs "Tree Wave Posts Free 'Virtual 45 RPM 10-Inch'", Jul. 28 2009
 * Art and Seek "Slocum Closing AndOr Gallery (Q&A)", May 2009
 * Also very good detail, with photos, about Paul Slocum's music, background etc. in the main Dallas Observer Music section, not blog or "events" Dallas Observer "Catch the Tree Wave" By Sam Machkovech, Dec 9 2004

Paul Slocum, by the way, is a bona fide computer science degree holder AND an artist whose work is notable enough to receive fine arts journal reviews, popular newspaper reviews and exhibition media coverage, recognition by Rhizome. That is more than, well, I've said enough. If you need any help, please let me know, okay? --FeralOink (talk) 15:23, 3 January 2013 (UTC)